The Hawaii records clerk came forward with his information, filing a formal declaration without a trial having gotten to the stage you claim it should be.
Will you join the records clerk in exposing 0 for the criminal that he (0) is?
Obama is exposed. Read http://svenmagnussen.blogspot.com Your concern for credit, glory, or money is blinding you to the facts about Obama’s ineligibility.
You, and others, are singularly focused on presenting evidence pretrial under the false premise a Federal Judge will ignore the FRCP to bring Obama to trial. It’s not going to happen. The FRCP must be followed.
A careful review of the FRCP will reveal secondary source witnesses, such as myself and Tim Adams, should not be a part of the controversy until the primary source is deposed and impeachment of their testimony is necessary. A secondary source witness won’t be necessary if the primary source tells the truth. Rules on the introduction of impeachment witnesses are necessary for the Court’s case management.
In Obama’s case, my testimony and Tim Adam’s testimony will be irrelevant if DHS Sec. Janet Napolitano produces certified copies of Obama’s immigration files. If the Sec. Napolitano testified, under oath in a deposition, Obama did not have an immigration file to reveal, then the Court and the defendant would be notified an impeachment witness will be called to offer a rebuttal. In the interest of case management, the FRCP has rules that indicate my rebuttal testimony will be ignored until the primary source has a chance to testify truthfully.
Not following the rules will delay the process further.