I do not believe that money could buy the genuine affection shown for Barry by his mom, and his grandparents in every photo available from the zoo to the beach with gramps to posing with his grandparents at Columbia (I don’t believe that was photoshopped). That is how I read the body language in the pics. I also regard Barry as having the same jaw-line as his grandfather.
If someone had paid money to place Barry with SADO and the Dunhams in HI in exchange for money, for what possible reason would they do that and why would they pick the Dunhams? Such a person would have to be out of their mind!
SADO was a struggling student who married a Muslim and took off for Indonesia with Barry and it would be a felony crime to take custody of a child under a false identity and take it out of the country, not to mention threaten the future of SADO and her mom’s bank VP position.
IMO the best evidence (abundant, IMO) and Occam’s Razor as well as common sense dictates that Stanley Ann is almost certainly Barry’s mom.
The Mal-Val narrative is all blanks or problematic on key questions such as:
1. Where was Barry conceived?
2. Where was Barry delivered?
3. Why did his mother and father give him up to SADO in 1964?
4. If SADO never saw Barry before 1964, why was he given to her with the name BHO? Mal and Val had no known connection to BHO Sr. in 1964.
5. Would a brief alleged baby-sitting episode supposedly in January 1961 by a distant cousin by marriage in Seattle to an alleged wife of BHO Sr. provide a sufficient connection to Mal and Val for their son to be named BHO as he was given to SADO to be his nanny?
6. Why did the alleged Asian Anna S Obama in Seattle, alleged secret wife of BHO Sr., give up her son to BHO Sr. to be taken to Kenya to be raised by Ruth in the great baby identity swap of 1964 and then disappear?
7. When were the pictures in Kenya of the two boys (alleged Roman and alleged Barry) taken in the studio and with BHO Sr. and Ruth? I do not believe that a coherent narrative can be constructed that places these two boys with these supposed identities in Kenya at the same time for these pictures, or at any place at the same time. (Of course, they are Mark and David!)
Here's a novel idea.
Instead of trying to prove researchers wrong, why don't you devote your energy to proving them right?
You've never added any useful information to these threads. All you've done thus far is post plagiarized information, and then tell people how wrong they are.
pla·gia·rize (v):
to take and use ideas, passages, etc., from (another's work.)