Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: SvenMagnussen
For example, Orly alleges Obama is not a natural born citizen of the U.S. and her client suffered harm because he was elected to an office he is not qualified for.

Obama offers a motion to dismiss because the election is really voted on by the electoral college, the vote has taken place, not one Congressman or Senator objected during the vote tally and he has been sworn in to a second term.

Orly should argue the case is about a harm suffered by her client due to the actions of the defendant(s) and not about Obama being sworn in.

Ok, two problems here.

First, the issue of standing. It's been discussed on this forum before and I will not argue the issue. I will just point out that many of the courts deciding this issue have denied that the plaintiff had standing to sue. They will continue to decide in that fashion, whether you agree with it or not.

Second, no court will accept a case for which they cannot provide relief. At this point, in the eyes of all the courts in the United States, Barack Obama is the President of the United States. There is no court which has authority to change that, so what relief can the plaintiff sue for?

774 posted on 03/07/2013 3:51:17 PM PST by ConstantSkeptic (Be careful about preconceptions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 763 | View Replies ]


To: ConstantSkeptic

“First, the issue of standing. It’s been discussed on this forum before and I will not argue the issue. I will just point out that many of the courts deciding this issue have denied that the plaintiff had standing to sue. They will continue to decide in that fashion, whether you agree with it or not.”

Yes. Most eligibility plaintiffs have filed lawsuits with the goal of exposing the truth on Obama’s background and they should stay focused on developing the case against defendants because their actions were contrary to law and the plaintiffs suffered a harm due to the actions of the defendants.

“Second, no court will accept a case for which they cannot provide relief. At this point, in the eyes of all the courts in the United States, Barack Obama is the President of the United States. There is no court which has authority to change that, so what relief can the plaintiff sue for?”

Yes. Eligibility plaintiffs should stay focused on obtaining compensation for the harm they have suffered due to the actions of the defendants. Instead of championing a void election or a do-over election, Orly should be demand $100 Million from Obama for America, Barack Obama II and Nancy Pelosi for her clients.


779 posted on 03/08/2013 4:44:27 AM PST by SvenMagnussen (Obama has a tell. When his lips are moving, you can tell he's lying.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 774 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson