To your “Suddenly and quietly all charges are dropped.” TV soap opera scenario, Eric Holder will give you due process, eh?
Here’s how they gave a guy who obtained private records illegally his due process, according to their interpretation of what was due him:
http://p.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/apr/19/key-witness-in-passport-fraud-case-fatally-shot/
So, If it’s not a soap opera and you have are protected per your #3, then you have nothing to fear. Why don’t you come out of the proverbial closet and wave the “precious” evidence around, unless you would rather keep it for posterity?
Speaking of a TV soap opera, in the spring/summer of last year, you posted that your “precious” evidence will be unveiled on TV TALK SHOW APPEARENCE COME OCTOBER ‘12 and that your doubters and detractors would see you parading it on TV for all to see! You didn’t say a word then about the illegality of what you were about to do.
No offense, I wrote the abundantly used word, “precious,” just to be hip and to keep up with the newspeak on this thread.
Oh, BTW, don’t ask for a link to that post because FR’s database isn’t allowing to access more than the current page of previous posts. If you deny what you wrote at the time, I’m sure some FReepers will remember your tease for the fall season coming attraction.
Also, while you’re at it, what happened to your camarad-in-arms, Todd Rodriguez, Ret.? Do you have any explanation as to why would a FReeper in good standing (not a troll, God forbid!) such as yourself, resort to unacceptable behavior like that? Were you issued a warning instead of a ticket?
Who are the “OBOTS and ConcernedFreepers” [sic]? Care to name some of those faux Conservative FReeper trolls? They’re having a go at each other on the thread that’s not because they’re trolls, IMO, but because they have passionate differences in opinions.
Failure to answer ANY of the above questions, and I repeat myself, will speak volumes about what you’re doing here.
I believe Sven maybe be telling the truth and here is why. If Sven was a Federal employee with access to certain records he may have seen what he claims exist in someway. But when any record is accessed there is a log of who and when. As Melancholy points out, that can get you a big headache.
So Sven is stuck between a rock and a hard place. He has knowledge that he can't do anything with but only hopes someone somewhere will.
IF (big, huge, gigantic *if*) you get an answer to “...evidence will be unveiled on TV TALK SHOW APPEARENCE COME OCTOBER ‘12” please ping me. My guess is that you’ll get an acceptable answer somewhere around the 12th of never.
It’s not rocket science. Any evidence obtained before a hearing on a responsive pleading is ignored because the judge operates from the perspective the allegations made in the complaint are true.
Why do so many OBOTS, ConcernedFreepers, and Orly insist evidence be submitted with the complaint when the judge ignores it? The motion to dismiss is analyzed on the basis of procedural matters, i.e. Fed Rules of Civil Procedure, and precedent.
If the case survives a Motion to Dismiss, the evidence needed can be obtained with a subpoena. Obama was subpoenaed in the GA Ballot Challenge and he ignored them. He didn’t ignore them because all the documents had been scrubbed. He ignored them because they were incriminating.
He will ignore all subpoenas because they will prove he’s not a natural born citizen. When subpoenas are ignored, they are not scrubbed or forged. They’re available, but not submitted. Contempt of Court is grounds for a default judgment. (That’s a win for the plaintiff.)
Next, it’s time for a damages hearing. The plaintiff will have to demonstrate damages and suggest compensation.