Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: bluecat6

Now, when he ask sarah to “Intervene”, that also means a 3rd party is involved — sounds like someone is coming there to start trouble.. my guess is stanley armour was coming there to retrieve ann(a) and wanted sarah to try to stop it or get between it or save it..


478 posted on 03/03/2013 7:44:55 AM PST by chicken head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 476 | View Replies ]


To: chicken head

After 5 years of looking at this I know there is some ‘supporting evidence’. If you accept it at face value as fact it can certainly indicate - a-ha, the smoking gun. But there is no single smoking gun. And at this point there is a lot of planted evidence to cause distraction and confusion.

The lies around this woman are many. She was a christian according to the MSM in 2008. They we find out she is hard-core Muslim. She seems to be a tool to be used in the matter.

As my list above indicates - a trip to Kenya by BHO Sr. is nowhere to be found. SADs timeline is very hidden here but his is less so. This also relies on the debunked ‘happy married couple’ storyline. It is just not there. In fact if anything SAD was kept in Washington UNTIL BHO was gone.

I will share my game of CLUE guess here for discussion so you know where my head is on this. This is not a claim that scenario did in fact happen. It is a only a guess that seems to match the very known factual data points.

Others can debate or debunk if they see fit...and I am sure they will...

The Dunham family was either a CIA family that was assigned to keep tabs on known communitist who would be trying steal military secrets from Boeing. The family was in Kasnas when Boeing was building WWII bombers - specifically the high tech B-29 and later the initial B-52s. B-52 manufacturing later moved to Seattle. And bingo the Dunham family shows up there with apparent ‘ties’ to the local known communist figures.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_B-52_Stratofortress

In 1962 production of the Buff (B-52)stopped in Seattle. For the Dunhams - mission over. They served their country well in keeping the red hoard from stealing our military secrets. Now what? Use that counter communist skill at a well-known communist hotspot - Hawaii. Set mom up with a nice bank job and dad (the ‘furniture salesmen’) can keep tabs on the local communist by hanging out with them at bars and other places.

For fun lets say Stanley Dunham cohorts with Frank Marshall Davis. Lets say that FMD figures out the role of the the Dunham family. Lets say in the world of spying and counter spying FMD figures the best way to role the Dunham family is to impregnate their daughter. Later he can wright about it in 1968 in his book.

When the Dunhams figure out a) she’s pregnant and/or b) who the father is they have to send her back stateside. They have to remover her from the situation. Are they double agents? Are they leveraged assets for FMD now? Who knows. But their daughter has to be sent away.

If they did not know they had a multi-racial grandchild on the way they did when the birth occurred - likely in WA or Canada. Obviously if they were assets for the US government spy complex they could not just say - well our target got our daughter pregnant. But after, the high profile black visitor from Kenya leaves the island for Harvard they can bring her back and claim her child was his. Its a plausible story and ties to a man who will likely never return to the island - Barack Obama. If US intelligence community was aware of the situation and was helping the Dunhams with their ‘multi-racial grandbaby situation’ doing all of this would be a simple domestic operation. Now eventually Obama is aware of his wife and child in Hawaii and uses them on his INS paperwork to try to stay in the US.

So Obama leaves, SAD comes back from stateside. Files for ‘divorce’. Sends papers to Obama. He never answers them. He may not even know what is going on! And then a judge does a one-way divorce basically. And now we have ‘Barack Obama II’ for the very first time.

Through this maybe SAD is now part of the Dunham family trade of keeping tabs on foreign spies or may she just likes foreigners and not the ‘blond crew cut boys’. But somehow she get involved with Lolo - an older man being trained in the US to be an asset when the communists are tossed from Indonesia. Indonesia goes through horrific massacres and murders in the mid-60s. Eventually the US-backed faction takes control. Lolo rolls in with his family from the US. All is good. He is on the fast track in Indonesia, he has a pretty US wife and she has a multi-racial child that he can claim as his without much questions. After all Obama was only 3 years when they go married. Heck at that age he could claim Obama as his biological child in Indonesia.

But then something happens. Someone figures out that Obama is not Lolo’s child or that he is American or that he the biological child of a communist. And remember the communist and non-communist were killing each over frequently in Indonesia during this period. Or maybe Obama and Lolo did not get along and Lolo did not want him as ‘his child’ anymore. In any case Obama leaves Indonesia. Apparently without his ‘parents’ (SAD and Lolo). But who would step-in, who would help in such a situation? Two possibilities - Frank Marshall Davis or the US intelligence agencies. One of these two entities likely ‘extracted’ Obama from Indonesia. In either case - you have a ‘refugee child’ who is subject to certain danger in his ‘home country’ of Indonesia. From here Sven’s story line takes root since the basic question is ‘what do you do with a parent-less foreign child’ in the US?

Since Obama senior is the legal and legally accepted biological father his presence is needed in 1971 to undo the adoption of Lolo Soetoro and to ensure the ‘rebaseline’ of Obama II’s past is done officially.

This is why it is hard to accept the facts of anything before 1972. In December of 1971 and early January 1972 Obama II’s official, state accepted past was likely completely rebuilt in the records. Hence why no one in Hawaii will really vouch for the events of 1961. If they know that there are sealed documents, adoptions, reversed adoptions, etc. then the real history may not be when the documents say - LEGALLY. If the court ordered up a whole new history on the child we know of BHO II the real past may never show up in legal documents.

So there it is. It is a broad sweep at this ongoing game of ClUE.

No, Col. Mustard. No candlestick. No study. But I think the events ‘may’ have happened.


479 posted on 03/03/2013 8:54:28 AM PST by bluecat6 ("All non-denial denials. They doubt our ancestry, but they don't say the story isn't accurate. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 478 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson