She called her ANNA, the same name as shown in the directory, and dates the 'meeting' to January 1961, which means, if ANNA had a baby, it would have been conceived BEFORE Stanley Ann Dunham graduated from high school.
Ann and her baby lived in the room above the garage. She babysat the black child in the spring for two or three months, when he was seven months old.
Mary baby-sat the child for ANNA in early 1961 - when her own daughter who was born in July 1959 was 18 months of age. That makes it JANUARY. When that didn't work with the AUGUST 1961 birthdate for zero, she corrected herself and said he was SEVEN MONTHS OF AGE. Add 7 months to January and presto, there's August. We have to remember that when Charlette telephoned Mary, Mary had no idea she was supposed to be the baby-sitter for zero. Mary didn't name the child. She said she baby-sat for ANNA for two or three months.
She was one of several baby sitters while Ann was in Seattle.
I wasn't aware of that...Did you notice that in the article Charlette had posted on her website ( now removed) Charlette refers to ANNA OBAMA as ANN and ANNA? She also says...'Mary called her ANNA, which proved to us that she knew Stanley Ann Dunham' ?
ALL THAT PROVES IS THAT MARY BABYSAT FOR THE WOMAN WHO WAS LISTED IN THE POLK DIRECTORY...AND IT WAS CHARLETTE WHO TURNED HER INTO SOMEONE ELSE.
Mary stated that the Seattle Times tried to pressure her into stating that Ann left the baby in Hawaii.
That's what Rick Anderson wrote in October 2008:
Meanwhile, Obama's mother, whose parents Madelyn and Stanley Dunham had moved here from Kansas a decade earlier, left Mercer Island in 1960. But she returned to live in Seattle around 1962, after Barack was born in August 1961, leaving her husband, Kenya-born Barack Sr., and his newborn namesake in Hawaii. She lived on Capitol Hill and enrolled at the University of Washington.
And there's that seven months again. Get it? Only this time there's NO CHILD.
Ann told her that she was 19 years old. She remembered that because she was about the same age. Mary was actually born seven years before Stanley Ann Dunham. She said that she didn't know her that well, since it was only three months and she was usually working or going to school in the evenings after 4:30, but did state that she was very pro-0bama because he believed in the same things as his mother. She stated that her husband, Joseph Toutonghi graduated in the spring of 1962 and they bought a house and moved. She first said that she didn't know why she left her husband, but later said that Ann told her that her husband was leaving her because he had to marry a black woman or he would lose his postion in the tribe in Kenya. Does she look like a black woman?
The continued use of three names in attempting to create the impression that the woman was Stanley Ann Dunham needs to be seen for what it is, a deliberate repeated attempt to establish ONE ID out of more than one person. I've never fallen for it, and can't follow why anyone else would. She can't be ANNA and ANN and STANLEY ANN and 'she' can't have a baby that was conceived while 'she' was still in high school, and then show up in Seattle with or WITHOUT a child in January 1961, and have articles written about the events which contradict each other; one says she showed up in early 1962 and the child was seven months old. The enrollment for the U of WA information must have been prepared in a panic!
ANNA OBAMA must have been the student. ANNA enrolled at the U of WA after the birth of her child in January, and the 'transcript' details you see are an amalgum of Stanley Ann from Mercer and the student ANN S OBAMA at the U of HI.
ANNA OBAMA sounds just like the girl Neil Abercrombie described, young and naive, totally in awe of the kenyan whom she sat beside and listened to without saying much; and that sounds nothing like Stanley Ann Dunham, whom her 'classmate' Chip Wall described as the 'original feminist'. ANNA OBAMA may have believed the kenyan when he told her he would have to take a tribal wife (he already had one and two children by her) But STANLEY ANN DUNHAM wouldn't have been that stupid, her 'best friends' tell us how brilliant she was...
The very first attempt at blending the three names comes from 'Dreams' I've posted the excerpt on FR before. I'll post it again in a seperate comment box.
“Mary baby-sat the child for ANNA in early 1961 - when her own daughter who was born in July 1959 was 18 months of age.”
Or Mary’s 74-year-old memory of the age of her own child as being 18 months when Barry was 7 months old while looking back 47 years could most likely be off by a year.
All of Mary’s comments except this one on her baby’s age exactly match a narrative of SADO and Barry being in WA in the spring of 1962 as corroborated by documents from multiple sources.
Against all circumstantial and documentary evidence, Mary’s memory of the age of her child causes you to dump all of the evidence pointing to Stanley Ann Dunham and Baby Barry...and allow you to insert an alternate mom and alternate baby into your preferred narrative.
You need the alternate mom and baby to support your Mal-Val narrative:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/2913366/posts
FReepers should ask themselves why Mary Toutonghi, who must have seen the wall-to-wall pictures in the press of Barry with his mom, wouldn’t have said that she had babysat a different baby (a baby who did not become president) for a different mother (who was supposedly Asian)?
In case FReepers missed it, the Mal-Val narrative has Mary Toutonghi being a distant relative by blood of Barry’s “real” mom, according to that Mal-Val narrative (see link above). In the Mal-Val narrative An Asian wife of BHO Sr. brings her mixed race baby to Seattle in January 1961 and this baby (now supposedly named Roman Obama) ultimately ends up being raised by BHO Sr. and his white wife Ruth in Kenya as the older step-brother to Barry.
This Mal-Val narrative requires that President Obama’s real half-brother, David, not exist...but I’ll let FReepers explore the great “dark boy” picture controversy on the Mal-Val thread if they want to plumb the depths of this incoherent narrative.