You misunderstood my entire statement, although you did quote it accurately.
There is not one person posting here who “saw” anything. They saw a video. They are discussing the video. One person has an interpretation of the video. That interpretation is either right or wrong.
And whether it is right or wrong is dependent on the facts, both what can be gleaned from the video, and what else was observed at the scene — not the number of people who have a different interpretation.
Fact is not decided by majority opinion. That was what I said. It is a bullying argument which suggests that a person should back down from their opinion because “so many people” disagree with them.
And all I’ll say is that I despise whatever definition of manhood the apologists for this vicious assault possess.
The so called “men” who are so personally and emotionally invested in any vicious animal in uniform that reflexively beats down a woman half his size, because water droplets touched his f*ck*ng sacred person... I just tell you straight out, people who defend this, are not men. Take that any way you want.
Woman beaters. And their fans. On the “premier conservative site on the internet”. Ain’t that a hoot?
They said on TV it looked like she signaled someone to throw water.