Jeff put on this thread, that JR supported Mitt Romney in 2008, because he accepted his current positions, and did not judge him by his past.
The post was to a guy laying into JR for not supporting Romney, and for not judging him by his current positions, and who was even denying that Romney even had that past.
I think we all agree that that is about as vicious a thing that we have seen put on JR, especially on his own, anti-Romney thread.
“Jeff put on this thread, that JR supported Mitt Romney in 2008, because he accepted his current positions, and did not judge him by his past.”
Is that it? Heck...I supported Romney then, too, because he was the alternative to McCain........and that’s it, and the only reason. However, I supported him in the end, and was disappointed that he dropped out.
“The post was to a guy laying into JR for not supporting Romney, and for not judging him by his current positions, and who was even denying that Romney even had that past.”
Please give me a link to the post. I would love to read it for myself.
Thank you in advance.
Anything good - evil attacks! And they think he will bring change. HA!
"Finally, a spirit came forward, stood before the LORD and said, 'I will entice him.' "'By what means?' the LORD asked.
"'I will go and be a lying spirit in the mouths of all his prophets,' he said. "'You will succeed in enticing him,' said the LORD. 'Go and do it.'
"So now the LORD has put a lying spirit in the mouths of these prophets of yours. The LORD has decreed disaster for you."
OK, I did catch a post from Jeff where he said he was mistaken about Jim supporting Romney way back when and he apologized for the error. Am I wrong about that?
I didn’t see the original Post though, but I can’t imagine Jeff attacking Jim. They go way back, and I don’t know of a more decent man than Jeff Head whose Posts I have been following for years here.
All I know is that Jeff is a better Man than I, which is why I was taken aback by your accusation towards him.
I would hope the incident was nothing more than a misunderstanding. As I said earlier, disagreements are not attacks, at least that’s the way it used to be around here.
Well, off to bed. Thanks for the quick reply.