Replies

Am incredulous that you would conclude; that stopping President - or rather, wannabe 'tyrant' - Obama's Agenda; will take less personal effort than holding 'Liberal' Romney's, feet to the fire; should he be President; despite Conservatives on board to help

Oh yes, absolutely. Remember it was "some companies are too big to fail" Bush that started the whole bailout mandate and handed the election to Obama. That is exactly the cycle we are poised to repeat. If you think this Obama is terrifying, wait until you see the one Romney will deliver the Executive Office to once his cycle has brought us that much closer to the drain. The slow boiled frog is less likely to escape the pot. Obama has put us on a rapid boil. Now is the time to escape. Romney may turn the temperature down a degree, but that in the long run is more dangerous. It's time to jump.

Why does this debate continue? We know everything we need to know about Romney/Ryan and Obama/Biden. Choose to support one or the other or choose to sit out the presidential part of the election. Those who wish for the end of the world so the sheeple will finally wake up and throw off their chains and stick it to the man: good luck with that. I will support Romney over Obama. You all do what you want and we will agree to disagree.

Certainly know the frog metaphor and the truth it speaks to. PC works in much the same way per anesthesizing mind and judgment. Still; you have lost me. . .

'Time to Jump'? Yes; jump the shark; perhaps.

FWIW: Bush did not hand the election to Obama; McCain did. More; our 'third rail' of politics; now more Dem, 'shadow Party'; made it all possible for Obama, by their failure as Media to inquire/investigate and to 'challenge' this candidate. They carried Obama's water; ignored all else and so earned their 'useful idiot' badges and hats. They are still wearing them.

As for 'backing up' and looking for 'real' blame; try Fannie and Freddie and the Demrats forcing mortgages/banks into loans they neither 'legitimately'- nor morally - should have made. That was the 'crux'. . But why even go here?

No question, Bush had his faults (and unlike Obama; paid dearly); but had McCain stepped up to the plate; and had found some serious Conservatism; we might have had a different ending to that election; but not likely. 'Change' so resonated; despite the lies. But enough of 'then' and 'Bush's fault'; it is lame and tiresome. Time is NOW and 'NO way] do I fear Mitt the Terrible - versus Obama. . .

Good news; in the meantime! While you were snoozing perhaps; O's hot water'; unlike Obama; Romney and Ryan; it is reported; are NOT interested in accommodating Shariah Law in America!