Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Sola Veritas; sf4dubya; KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Voting for Romney is not hard work, it is being a surreneder monkey to the GOP establishment and Romeny’s liberalism.

Bingo...

Also, for Kent in Seattle, a vote for Romney in liberal Washington state means absolutely NOTHING. (He won't take Washington state)

So why all the hustle & bustle by the Romney-ites to push him in blue states that Romney can't win?

Even in the red states, all the FREEPERs could vote for Goode/Hoefling -- and Obama still can't touch Romney in those states.

The Romney-ites have been spreading their "huff and their puff and we'll blow the White House down" hubris too broadly...they should focus on the swing states -- and stop with the (sometimes) nastiness aimed at voters and potential voters that won't matter in the electoral vote scheme of things.

2,173 posted on 08/12/2012 7:23:15 PM PDT by Colofornian (Why don't you 'birthers' ask Mitt about his 'spirit-birth' on planet near Kolob? Hypocrisy @ work?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2149 | View Replies ]


To: Colofornian
Also, for Kent in Seattle, a vote for Romney in liberal Washington state means absolutely NOTHING. (He won't take Washington state)

This has been explained to them over and over again on this thread, ad nauseum, ad infinitum.

It. Simply. Does. Not. PENETRATE. ;)

2,176 posted on 08/12/2012 7:25:54 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("If you're not fiscally AND socially conservative, you're not conservative!" - Jim Robinson, 9-1-10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2173 | View Replies ]

To: Colofornian

“The Romney-ites have been spreading their “huff and their puff and we’ll blow the White House down” hubris too broadly...they should focus on the swing states — and stop with the (sometimes) nastiness aimed at voters and potential voters that won’t matter in the electoral vote scheme of things.”

I don’t see Romney as much of an improvement over Obama. I don’t think either should be POTUS. I think people should vote third party to send a message that neighter are OK. I don’t care if it is a swing state, red state, or blue state. We all agree that Obama is a poor/dangerous POTUS and doesn’t deserve reelection. However, like Jim Robinson, I cannot support Romney as an alternative to Obama. I don’t want either. At least, by voting third party, it “may” (if enough will help) deny either man more than 40% of the vote. They cannot claim a mandate in that case.

The primary process is horribly flawed. There is no way Romney could have won if there was some form of runoff elections in the process. However, Romney ran a dirty campaign and spent more time attacking conservatives than he did Obama. Plus, he just plain bought the election with the backing of the GOP establishment. I cannot back such a system anymore. So, I will not vote for Romney. And I don’t think any real (full conservative - social, defense, & fiscal) should give him and the GOPe their backing.


2,529 posted on 08/13/2012 5:02:38 AM PDT by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2173 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson