Replies

I asked you to copy-and-paste my own words, and not to distort what I said. And, just as I expected, you did not copy-and-paste a single word of mine, and instead distorted what I said.

Here's what you said in Post #1745:

No, they don't. Given there is a 100% certainty that neither Goode or Hoefling will be the next president of the United States, then they cannot possibly qualify as ABO. Under your definition, both you and I qualify as ABO. But what person who believed removing Obama is imperative to the survival of the country, would waste a vote on either of us? A lunatic, perhaps.

So then, according to your own exclusion "Anybody" cannot be: You, Goode, EternalVigilance, Ron Paul, etc.

Indeed the Col has you with his accusation: "You said Goode and Hoefling did not qualify as ‘anyone’."

So then, according to your own exclusion "Anybody" cannot be: You, Goode, EternalVigilance, Ron Paul, etc.

I did not even use the word "Anybody," as in a person. Here are my words, which you yourself posted:

Given there is a 100% certainty that neither Goode or Hoefling will be the next president of the United States, then they cannot possibly qualify as ABO.

*ABO*. An acronym. As in an Anybody-But-Obama. Which is being used in these threads to denote a candidate for president during this election cycle.

Are your reading comprehension skills so piss poor that you actually believe I am suggesting that Goode, Hoefling, EternalVigilence, and even *myself*, are not real people?

Well then, let me help you by saying, since there is zero chance that either Goode or Hoefling can defeat Obama, then neither one can be considered a serious ABO candidate for POTUS by those for whom removing Obama is imperative this election cycle.