To: Colonel_Flagg; John W
Everyone here IS anti-Obama. At least as near as I can tell. However, ABO appears to be the universally accepted label. Virgil Goode is anyone, and so is Tom Hoefling. But when those inconvenient facts are brought up, people tend to get defensive. So it appears NBR is perhaps more accurate. As in, Nobody But Romney.Bingo!
One of the best posts of this portion of the thread.
I've said -- for months -- something similar to this..the "NBR" is great insight.
What I've said is: "ABO" is simply a euphemism for pro-Romney...otherwise, they wouldn't get defensive re: Goode or Hoefling. (Because, they, too qualify as "ABO")
1,719 posted on
08/12/2012 1:55:34 PM PDT by
Colofornian
(Why don't you 'birthers' ask Mitt about his 'spirit-birth' on planet near Kolob? Hypocrisy @ work?)
To: Colofornian
re: Goode or Hoefling. (Because, they, too qualify as "ABO")No, they don't. Given there is a 100% certainty that neither Goode or Hoefling will be the next president of the United States, then they cannot possibly qualify as ABO.
Under your definition, both you and I qualify as ABO. But what person who believed removing Obama is imperative to the survival of the country, would waste a vote on either of us? A lunatic, perhaps.
1,745 posted on
08/12/2012 2:08:58 PM PDT by
kevao
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson