Posted on 08/11/2012 4:42:48 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
Except for his unfortunate go along to get along support of TARP, bailouts, stimulus spending and the increased credit limit, etc, Ryan is a pretty good choice. Probably the best choice of the RINOS that were on Romney's short list. I support Ryan for the vice presidency. Wish he were at the top of the ticket, though.
But I still cannot and will not support the grand father of ObamaCare. Romney still loves and brags about his bastard brainchild, RomneyCare, even today when he knows what an anti-liberty socialist POS it is.
And the fact that he advocated that abortion should be safe and legal in America for over three decades of his adult lifetime and even advocated that Roe v Wade should be supported and sustained as settled law precludes any consideration whatsoever by this pro-life Christian for Myth Romney for the presidency.
And the fact that he boasted that he would be better for "gay rights" than Ted Kennedy, and proved it just increases my resistance.
That, and his penchant for gun control, his continuing support for global warming, gays in the scouts, gays in the military, and his record of appointing liberal judges makes it all but impossible for me to support him.
Lastly, we're having a bit of changeover on our moderator staff. At least two moderators resigned this afternoon after I flatly refused to rein in a so-called anti-Mormon "bigot" on FR. Well, if being in opposition to false prophets and false prophecy makes a Christian believer a bigot, then I guess I'm a bigot. I've posted before that I flat do not believe that the Book of Mormon is the true word of God. Nor do I believe that Joseph Smith was a prophet of God. The Christian bible warns us to be weary of false prophets and that I am. Romney being the presumptive Republican nominee does not change that fact.
Just look at his post history. There is a really great search feature here.
***You posted the claim, so provide the links. I believe it’s the first time I’ve ever seen JimRob say it’s okay to relinquish our conservative principles.
I don’t know why people look at him as a leader. He is just the guy who runs the site.
***To each his own. I don’t know why anyone would look at your posts and think you’re a conservative.
Did I say anything was forced? That first quote wasn't even mine.
LV Ron,
I have studied the history of Germany in the 20th century and particularly the rise of the nazi party and the rise of Hitler.
What Jim from C-Town has told you is 100% correct.
As a matter of fact:
Hitler insisted that his becoming chancellor be done in strict accordance with the constitution in place in Germany at the time.
Where on earth are you getting information that indicates otherwise?
Just don’t demonize those who have to do that, and we won’t begrudge you your conscious voting or whatever rationale you have.
***Bowlsheet. I’ve seen tons of demonizing of conservatives from mittbots.
Again, it was specifically the open season on Mormons thing I object to,
***Then re-read the article. He never declared open season on Mormons. You got it wrong.
because it is NOT very conservative to do that. I think he got that message pretty clear.
***If you’re so concerned about the mormonism thing, why haven’t you logged onto the myriad threads dealing with mormonism? You would have ended up thinking it’s the mormons who have trouble with hatred. Instead, you chose to introduce yourself to the mormonism correction stuff right here, under straw man conditions, and you sowed tons of discord among conservatives. Obama thanks you for your efforts to sow such discord.
That’s one of the reasons I gave up on Certifigate threads. Also, I didn’t think we’d make any progress once the Usurper was sworn in. I was right.
Certifigate Post Mortem
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2168149/posts
Posted on 01/20/2009 9:42:15 AM PST by Kevmo. Certifigate Post Mortem. With the inauguration of zer0bama today, it signals the end of a phase in the ...
Your tagline says it all.
LOL, that was cute, it could have been a little less gay, but cute anyway.
All said; for our Military; for their past/present and future sacrifice; for our Founding Fathers; for Israel; for America's Judeo-Christian heritage; for our Constitution and our fundamental Freedoms; so contained; and, most critically - NOT - for, Obama's fundamental change. I will support Mitt; and with him; the 'rest' of our Repub Party/Tea Party; which; by Congressional - and Conservative - measure; IS improving with every Election.
(A footnote you can forget about it; with 'four more' from Obama.)
[You think Putin actually 'won' his election in Russia? We know; history has it's own litterbox of Marxist/Leninist/Maoist degradations. Cannot happen here? Think again. If our Constitution is in shreds; 'who is going to stop Obama and under what authority'? What has NOT surprised/shocked you; these past three years per Obama's leadership? How is our 'Holder Justice' working in standing tall for America's 'Rule of Law' and for your rights as an American citizen?
( Don't take Free Republic for granted either. Obama has his swords out for Conservative Media. This too; written on 'the wall'. . .and Obama has nothing to fear; in going there.) We know, as well; that Obama; suffers no conscience when it comes to means.]
Can only add that Obama's American Hell will not happen with my vote; nor as critically; without it.
Please go back and read the original argument.
Hitler was not elected by the people, he was appointed.
Thank you.
Isn’t it interesting how “If you don’t vote for Romney you’re an anti-mormon/insane/etc bigot!” Sounds an awful lot like...
“If you don’t accept homosexual (whatever) you’re a homopnobe!”
And most likely by some of the same people saying each...
[smiles]
It was your anti-Mormon thread. It was vile. It had many comments and it was deleted, poof, gone, down the rabbit hole. I have screenshots of the entire thread. If you didn’t ask to have it deleted then many here were mistaken because it said thread asked to be deleted by poster. However if you didn’t ask to have it removed then apparently the powers that be here on FR also found it so vile they deleted it. After all, FR does have to watch out for it’s reputation and people like you are well on the way to destroying it.
Really? If things continue as they are, I don’t see how we avoid ...
***Every time there’s a CINO running for pres, we see the same hyper-inflated set of fears.
And if you think that with Obama in the White House, this country emerge from that crisis as a constitutional republic,
***I think we LOST the constitutional republic the day that zer0bama was sworn in, because the SCOTUS didn’t do their job and check into his eligibility per the 20th amendment. So... your fears have already been realized. Either way, the best approach is to remain true to your principles. By discarding conservatism to vote for a librul, you are left with nothing remaining to fight for.
>>Ricktard? How about a Newtgirl
“he he! That is great I wish more people would see it! I took a long time making up my mind about the candidates, I think I gave them all a pretty good chance but I have decided on Rick Perry. Go Rick Go!”
17 posted on Monday, January 02, 2012 11:35:46 AM by Ditter
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2827760/posts?page=17#17“Thank you Angelo Mozilo”
—Rick Perry.
How bout a Chameleon RINO?
Nope. You didn’t make the case.
Not only that, but the case against you being conservative grows with each post. You should be spending your time converting 0bots into mittbots, but instead you’re sowing discord among conservatives on this conservative website. That aint conservative.
Point to it.
[::crickets::]
[::crickets::]
[::crickets::]
That's okay, though. I wasn't expecting anything more than that, really.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.