David has done no such thing, IMO, as I personally contested his analysis. The U of HI cross-corroborates the U of WA on the 1961 U of WA courses and they both confirm a Mercer HS graduation in 1960. All of that is solid, verifiable (can be repeatedly verified by others at any time) documentary evidence, plus you've got Polk with a “good enough” variant of SADOs name NEVER associated with an alleged mystery “other wife” of BHO Sr....the alleged mother of Roman Obama. Against this David has only offered his personal speculation about how particularly one of several U of WA docs “should” look.
The fact is, little jeremiah, there has never been a single credible document or credible narrative posted on FR that I have seen which will support a claim that anyone but Stanley Ann Dunham is the mother of the White House occupant. That is why I started this thread so that evidence, not empty claims, could be posted either for or against SADO being the mom, or for or against another candidate to be the mom, such as Valerie Sarruf. Perhaps the thread could by pinged to the list now?
David took it apart well enough for plenty of other people. People who aren’t investing in making SAD and apparently BHO the parents. And you think Maraniss is “an historian”!
ROTFLMAO.
Really you did no such thing--your response was to call me a liar which is just fine, you are certainly welcome to do that.
Facts are, as I told you, I was sitting there writing you with a handful of actual 1961 original entry transcripts from the U of W lying on my desk next to my monitor; I had and have first hand knowledge of the security entry system which was designed to keep students from modifying academic records in any way which required use of the form actually in place in 1961. The form the U furnished Corsi had two binder pin holes; the actual form had 21; the actual form was designed not to be removed but to be completed in handwriting and delivered in the form of a photocopy of the original document on which the U stamped a certification where a certified transcript was required; the actual original was three column, not two; etc. There really isn't any doubt that the form they furnished Corsi is fraudulent.
Matter of fact I sent Corsi a sample of the true form and I believe he has shown it to one or two other people.
I am not going to post a copy here at the moment because although I redacted the forms I sent Jerry, there is enough information on them that a determined person with access to all the records could reconstruct who the student was and I am not interested in making that information available at the moment.
In the real world of controversy, if you are going to say I contested something--you say well here is a sample of the form; here is the provenance of that form demonstrating that the Stanley exhibit is in fact the real thing.
It's fine to call me a liar but I delivered a real sample and enough people here on the board know me that I can afford not to be concerned whether you believe me or not; nor frankly, am I very concerned about having you call me names.
I do think you ought to lay off the nasty antagonistic emotional attack on Fred--Fred does a lot of work; it's very effective; Fred has uncovered a number of the gaps in zero's story and has found a number of facts that suggest what really happened. For the most part, I think people here on the board really appreciate Fred's efforts.
I intend to provide a more comprehensive response to some of your comments when time permits.