You are missing some key possible motivations for the White House forgery.
Yes, Barry could have obtained his 2007 issued COLB by filing a registration of an original or amended birth event attested to by witnesses and/or “evidence” at any time up to and including 2007 with all of the information shown on that COLB.
But what FReeper Danae showed was that she could obtain right up until 2011 a certified image of her original 1961 LFBC. THAT is NOT something that can be ginned up at any time after the original 1961 period, which Barry has led everyone to expect should be the case.
Barry backed himself into a corner by leading people to expect an LFBC EXACTLY LIKE the Nordyke twins LFBCs. The twings BC's showed Kapiolani as the hospital and had specific registrar and MD signatures appropriate for 1961 that couldn't be obtained for an after the fact HI registration...without resorting to forgery.
According the the Arpaio Posse research, the LFBC is 100% an electronic construct compiled from elements that were forged or cut and pasted from who knows where, but that pdf DOES NOT EXIST as a paper document anywhere.
Therefore speculation about how Stanley Ann's signature was forged or whether it appeared or in what form on an original 1961 HI LFBC can NOT be based on the White House pdf image, IMO.
If SAD was the mother and BHO from Kenya the father, there would have been no reason for any forgery to occur at all.
Therefore speculation about how Stanley Ann's signature was forged or whether it appeared or in what form on an original 1961 HI LFBC can NOT be based on the White House pdf image, IMO.
You can't see the forest for the trees. A) As I stated above, there would be no reason whatsoever to patch SAD's name using part ball point pen and part fine tip marker (which hadn't been invented in 1961, or at least in common use), if they had a sample of her name they could have just lifted from another document. And B) You are nitpicking things that mean nothing to anyone but your own mind. The point is really quite simple, no advanced degrees necessary. The document presented (actually both) by the WH are forged. And SAD's name is forged using scraps of different signatures. Which they would NOT HAVE HAD TO DO if they even had ONE document with the name "Stanley Ann Dunham Obama" on it to lift. And the other point, real simple, no genius IQ needed:
If SAD and BHO the Kenyan were the parents, no matter where the kid was born, there would have been no need for a forgery AT ANY TIME. The guy in the WH would have had a "fake but real" b.c. his whole life. And if he was adopted in Indo, and somehow whatever he wound up with indicated he had lost his citizenship, of course then he would need a "brand new" forged one. But if SAD were the mother, no need for the patch job on her forged signature.