And there's the rub, after so many insults and disgusting, hostile behaviour, you can take my word for it, I wouldn't give either of them a clue to save themselves if their hair was in fire. In all my years on FR, I have never experienced anything like it. Telling us where and when we may post a comment, claiming ownership of a topic, demanding to be informed of research results, accused of being a subversive engaged in a campaign of misinformation by lazy dimwits who bring nothing but rudeness to the discussion.
Bottom-feeders and blog pimps!
Try that sort of behaviour on a left-wing site and see how far you get. Conservatives are far too polite.
What we are experiencing is nothing short of FASCIST behaviour.
begin quote from the thead article:
The researchers claim that they earnestly want to remove Obama from office. But wouldnt revealing ALL EVIDENCE of a foreign mother and foreign birth (which they also claim) be the most logical approach to removing Obama rather than hiding the identity of this alternative mother for years while attacking FR threads that sincerely attempt to find out where Stanley Ann Dunham was when she gave birth to Barry?
In my opinion, the best evidence that Valerie Sarruf is NOT Barrys mother is the mountain of evidence that Stanley Ann Dunham IS his mother, which the researchers have totally failed to refute.
Again, please use this thread for discussion of and links to any evidence that either supports or refutes a claim that Valerie Sarruf IS Barack Obamas mother with or without Malcolm X being his father.
end quote
IMO, the ball is in the court of those “researchers” promoting the Mal-Val narrative to bring forward even a shred of evidence in support of when and where Malcolm X and Valerie Sarruf got together to produce Barry.
IMO, the court of public opinion is the only remaining venue that can be used to eject Barry from the presidency and that requires making findings of evidence public, as Joe Arpaio has done, and the getting funding to bring ballot actions or to fund additional evidence gathering all of which will serve to bring forward more folks who have been holding back on more evidence and will be emboldened to come forward.
As to the FBI file, the files on X for 1960, particularly September and October, are interesting to say the least. He seems to be in New York and New Haven spouting hated for and wishing horrible death on all whites, although he is reported to have considered Russians, like Lenin with some Asian blood, and Stalin with some Georgian blood to be “non-whites” and candidates to ally with American blacks to achieve a revolution...while denouncing communists, such as Castro, as atheists at other times. No sign of Valerie Sarruf in the NYC area that I can see.
There are totally blacked-out pages suspiciously in 1960, I note, not that I expect there is any evidence in support of the Mal-Val narrative in those pages.