[philman_36]

LMAO, there you go again - misreading sentences.
No, I'm not. Things were said and it's right there in black and white for all to see.
..."much of which", not "all of which"...
That means what it means and can only be read in one manner.
If the wrong words were used then an admission eliminates the curiosity such a statement raises.

What you quoted was: ...much of which has not been published here...
What part of the word "not" don't you understand?
I understand that "not" published here means it, potentially, was published elsewhere. Or else, again, the wrong words were used to convey what was meant.

Why don't you let the author of those words answer for themselves?

[Brown Deer]

That means what it means and can only be read in one manner.

So why are you so confused? I've seen things here. Why haven't you?

I understand that "not" published here means it, potentially, was published elsewhere.

and "potentially" does not mean it actually happened, does it?

Why don't you let the author of those words answer for themselves?

Because for some idiotic reason, you seem to believe that when you address a comment to someone here on FR, that it sends an alarm to their braim through microwaves and lets them know that you are impatiently awaiting a reply to your moronic post.

What time is it there? About 3am? ;-)