There would appear to be a few major misunderstandings in what you write:
The INS FOIA docs are frequently quoted by Mal-Val cult believers when it suits them, especially revelation of the crossing out of the name Soebarkah just a few comments back on this thread.
When the INS documents are 'quoted' the information is always accompanied by a copy of the document, which you have the opportunity to investigate and critique. The name Soebarkah being crossed out had absolutely nothing to do with the INS docs, that was from her passport file. Stanley Ann had the name removed FROM HER PASSPORT in August, 1968.
The INS FIOA docs were retained for 50 years in a federal government repository and I have seen no credible evidence of forgery in any of the documents that have been obtained by several investigators. These documents DESTROY Barry’s father’s reputation and Barry’s foundational narrative in numerous ways which makes it highly unlikely that Barry’s Obots would have forged them to achieve destruction of his own narrative.
There has never been any contention of which we are aware, that any document in the INS file has been tampered with in any way since the documents were completed and handed in to the INS. The changes which were made and the 'corrections and additions' such as changes to the name of the 'wife' and the addition of the name of a child, were made BEFORE the documents were filed. Rather than 'achieve the destruction of his own narrative' these changes became the narrative.
Any claim by the Mal-Val cult members that Obots forged the INS docs to distract from a secret son of BHO Sr. born to an unknown mother who grew up to be a specific person, Roman Obama who is only 8 months older than Barry but claimed to be in pictures with Mark appearing to be 3 years different in age is unsupported by any evidence or REASON that I have seen and appears to be delusional, IMO.
That entire paragraph is delusional and simply shows how incapable you have been of following a simple progression of images showing the children and their various ages. Or it's a deliberate attempt to present something in such a garbled fashion that it's guaranteed no one will be able to follow it.
To the Mal-Val cult members on this thread, I implore you: REPENT!
I think I know who might be repenting when this is all over. There's no such thing as a Val-Mal Cult, there's only an anti-Val-Mal Cult, of which you are the dear leader.
Ann Dunham is named iStanley n the INS documents as specifically being impregnated by BHO Sr., living with her parents in Honolulu and intending to attend college in WA state ALL of which is corroborated by U of H and U of W transcripts and witness accounts, many of whom are living.
One Memo dated August 31, 1961, which miraculously names her and the boy and has its counterpart written in a hand other than the person who partly completed the form, two weeks after the miracle birth. The language you use Ann Dunham is named iStanley n the INS documents as specifically being impregnated by BHO Sr is really quite offensive, and as you have used similar language when asserting that it was Frank Marshall Davis...I'm of the opinion you are a bit of a vouyer, sir.
The 'transcript' which came to light supposedly from the U of WA is just a little iffy when you consider that it starts on September 19, 1961, and both Charlette Le Fevre, who says she 'found' Stanley Ann Dunham because Anna Obama was listed in the 1961 Seattle directory, placed her in Seattle in early 1962, as did Mary, after she realised that any child born in January 1961, as she first stated, would have been conceived while little Stanley Ann was still in high school.
As for the rest of it, what Zullo may or may not claim isn't any of my busines.
For the readers, I will post the items referred to in this comment in the next reply box.
August 9, 1961. He's married to someone crossed out and replaced with Ann S Dunham, but he doesn't have a child.
August 8, the Memo. Looks like Ann S Obama plans to enroll at the U of WA. Maybe that's ANNA OBAMA who shows up in the Polk in Seattle. There's good reason to ask if perhaps this same woman wasn't the Ann S Obama shown in the Honolulu directory also in 1961.
The same student perhaps, enrolled at the U of HI for Fall, 1960, who met the kenyan in a Russian Class?
Finally, he gets it all together:
In APRIL 1964, one month after the so-called divorce, he's 'legally separated' from Ann Obama, he knows the name of the child, who is here called jnr. But what might make one wonder is, why is the handwriting on that form not all the kenyans? Why does it look like someone else filled in the form - and was that done after he signed it? And why does the hand-writing look so much like the writing on the Memo?