There’s a big difference between a 1960s woman avoiding the camera and having no one at all remember that she was pregnant.
There are no pictures whatsoever of my parents’ wedding, but there were many witnesses who have described the scene in detail to me.
In the case of Stanley Ann Dunham, we have neither photographic nor eyewitness evidence of a pregnancy.
It became apparent to me several years ago that we will never know who 0 is by following planted crumbs like Hansel and Gretel did.
However, when you’re hungry, it’s easiest to swallow what’s laid in front of you.
“There’s a big difference between a 1960s woman avoiding the camera and having no one at all remember that she was pregnant.”
The INS FOIA (official US gov’t) docs record that Stanley Ann was pregnant, reportedly (from the U of HI, another government entity) by BHO Sr. and that the baby was being considered for adoption out to the Salvation Army.
This pregnancy of an 18-year-old white girl with a black sperm donor was a scandal so I am not in the least bit surprised that there are no pictures of this errant young woman “knocked-up” in her freshman year at college.
At to that the numerous witnesses in Kenya and Kenyan Gov’t documents of removal of Mombasa hospital records the week of the birth claimed by Corsi showing high circumstantial evidence that Stanley Ann was in Kenya for the birth and could have arrived there as early as February 1961, the date of her last recorded appearance in HI at her wedding, as noted in the FOIA docs and the divorce decree.