I’ll take the ‘Lebanese mother and african-american radical’ as parents thank you. Probably born in some out of the way place in Canada in 1961, handed over to a Nanny when he was three weeks old. Nanny showed him to Susan, told her a bunch of lies and took little Bari to stay with his auntie in Boston.
Mother flies back to her acting career in London, no one in Egypt or Lebanon knows about her relationship with a coloured muslim and all’s well that ends well for the President of The American University of Beirut.
Such a scandal, averted.
And when Anna decided to take the advice of her parents to give up her child and go to Indonesia to stay with relatives, her boy, whose father was the kenyan, ended up at Auntie Ella’s as well. That’s really the only way it makes sense, when we hear that the kneyan told his associates that he visited his son several times while he was at Harvard.
That’s the story behind the two little boys.
And it all starts out with Stanley Ann Dunham NOT being the mother.
I think Seize is on the right track, there’s really no other explanation that makes any sense.
I forgot to ask you, what was the relationship between the baby-sitter’s husband in Seattle and the President of The American University of Beirut? I’m really not very good at following family trees.
Cross-posting:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3029745/posts?page=509#509
Kesslers rant was extremely foolish. Perhaps drink-inspired.
I agree, Kenny Bunk. Kessler strikes me as having walked into Zullos presentation cold knowing nothing of the evidence and wildly exaggerated when Zullo actually said as well as conflating speculation with evidence.
Subsequent to last Monday when Kessler went on his rant and follow-up Facebook claims since retracted, Zullo has given an interview where he directly contradicts Kesslers claims that Zullo had privately presented proof that Barry was NOT Kenyan and that Stanley Ann was NOT his mom or that Barry was a Saudi.
509 posted on Thursday, June 13, 2013 11:13:34 AM by Seizethecarp