Might as well give it up, the resident obstructionists are here to prevent us posting anything from our research, if it doesn’t follow the fairy-tale in dreams or showing on forged documents, it’s not real.
I’m receiving private messages telling me that what I am posting is most interesting - I would have liked to go on, I would like nothing better than to show what an interesting story looks like, and finally bring this sorry tale to a conclusion, but not with the monster door-stops that pop up with no other motive than to prevent anything other than their conspiracy theories being given the light of day; that the KGB paid for a voyage to Kenya for the model who posed for exotic images for Frank Marshall Davis to hide her pregnancy and she brought the child back to Madelyn to be cared for. Or Stanley Armour had an affair with a black barmaid in Honolulu and brought their offspring back to Madelyn to, like it was a stray cat. Is there anything you would like to add to that, Seethecrap?
BD, don’t let him make you angry, he would like nothing better than to see you banned or suspended.
“that the KGB paid for a voyage to Kenya for the model who posed for exotic images for Frank Marshall Davis to hide her pregnancy and she brought the child back to Madelyn to be cared for. Or Stanley Armour had an affair with a black barmaid in Honolulu and brought their offspring back to Madelyn to, like it was a stray cat.”
For the record, since FN continues to post false claims about me:
I have never claimed that any of those were supported by any evidence. I never concluded that the nude model was Stanley Ann, although I will admit to staring at the pictures long and hard! I never ever remotely thought the black barmaid and Gramps speculation was plausible.
I’m receiving private messages telling me that what I am posting is most interesting - I would have liked to go on, I would like nothing better than to show what an interesting story looks like, and finally bring this sorry tale to a conclusion, but not with the monster door-stops that pop up with no other motive than to prevent anything other than their conspiracy theories being given the light of day...
That is - since people are freepmailng you that they are interesting, and many of us say ont threads we are interested, and no doubt many are interested who say nothing - how about letting any disrupting comments remained unanswered? Most of us who are interested in truth just skip over them anyway. It's been many moons since I read a comment by any disruptor, my eyes just jump over them and I read only the interesting serious stuff. If no one ever responds to disrupting comments life would be better for all concerned - we'd still get to read about the research, you'd still get to post it, and no one would get banned and no threads pulled. This is utterly fascinating and I am so glad to be able to read more of what has been found out.
Fred, I’m one of those who has given up posting because of all the rancor. There are a couple of FR posters I could name who are downright loons.
I’m also one of those who is very much interested in your research and would like to continue hearing the story.
Would that you could just ignore Carp’s bait. Not that he will quit posting if you don’t bite, but responding does seem to fuel him.