Cross-posting:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3015864/replies?c=151
To: WildHighlander57
I believe he attempted to do so. The INS wasn’t buying it. Back then, they weren’t following that “Anchor baby” crap. Eisenhower deported hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants back in the 1950s, along with their US born children.
“Anchor baby” crap is a phenomena that started occurring in the 1970s according to Ann Coulter. Jeff Winston will tell you it was always the law, but he is full of Obama.
151 posted on 05/06/2013 8:22:23 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
To: DiogenesLamp
Diogenes lamp,
You’re right, I think bho SR was trying to stay based on something other than anchor baby, and the ina was getting wind of his running around w girls; I remember reading later on where one girls mom was writing to them complaining about it.
Back in 1961 good moral character was way more important than today.
The ina was also concerned about bho SR and SADO living in separate states.
(For clarification, the quote below is from greenperson:
Dr. Eowyn makes a very good point: If BHO the elder had acknowledged the birth of a US citizen son to the INS,that “anchor baby” would be his ticket to stay in the USA. Why didn’t he use that son as an argument against his own deportation,several years later,when he was kicked out of the USA? Barry was supposed to be living in Hawaii at the time,with his mother. Even though they were estranged,his “son” was still his son, wasn’t he?
98 posted on Sun May 05 2013 15:14:44 GMT-0500 (CDT) by Greenperson [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies | Report Abuse])
155 posted on 05/06/2013 9:01:38 AM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000))
