Cross-posting:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/2306351/posts?page=11015#11015
To: Fred Nerks
Dates of interest as I have them.
8/31/1961 Obama Senior files for extension. List spouse as Stanley Ann Dunham. Does NOT list Obama II as child in extension. Form list Obama Senior Birth Date as 1934 (not 1936) in his own hand….
6/22/1962 BHO Sr. leaves Hawaii
9/17/1962 Obama Senior writes extension request. In request he indicates his birth date is in 1936 and not 1934. He list ‘Married’ but no spouse name. List child ‘Roy’.
9/18/1962 Lolo Soetoro comes to US.
9/20/1962 SAD returns to Hawaii from Washington. Lives with parents.
6/6/1963 BHO Senior writes extension request with birth date of 1936 instead of 1934. Form is mostly typed. Fields for Spouse and Child are blank. Hand written admin note and arrow to proper indicates ‘He is married’.
6/15/1963-9/1/1963 Lolo Soetoro does ‘mainland tour’ at Northwestern U and Wisconsin U. Dates are not exact.
12/12/1963 Kenya becomes independent.
1/20/1964 Date Stanley Ann signs paper swearing to mistreatment - paper is filed in divorce.
1/23/1964 Filing of Obama Stanley Ann Divorce
3/8/1964 Final divorce Decree for SAD and BHO Sr.
4/21/1964 Obama files extension request. DOB in own hand is 1936 and form list Obama II as USC son who is 2 years old and list SAD as wife (untrue since divorce was final).
4/24/1964 Sukarno arrives in the US. Officially greeted by President Kennedy.
7/6/1964 BHO Sr. leaves US.
Based on these documents Obama adopts a new birth date in between August 31, 1961 and September 17, 1962. In between these dates is when he moved from Hawaii to Harvard.
I have speculated he did this for one of the following reasons:
a) to ‘match-up’ the incorrect date on Obama II’s forms.
or
b) He needed to be younger for some reason at Harvard or to stay in the US or some other reason.
It is not just sloppiness by him or administrators. Its in his own hand. He changed it. And once he changed it the 1936 was used continuously. To this day you will find the 1936 date as the ‘official’ date in biographies, etc. No reporter or investigator or government official has ever explained why he changed his birth date.
11,015 posted on Saturday, April 13, 2013 10:25:42 AM by bluecat6 (”All non-denial denials. They doubt our ancestry, but they don’t say the story isn’t accurate. “)
Cross-posting:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/2306351/posts?page=11060#11060
To: Fantasywriter
There you go again, playing the victim, stealing more oxygen, you have never, that I can recall, provided one lick of information that might have been of interest, it’s just poor poor me...and how upset you’ve been. Cry me a river. We have all had enough of a hard time trying to keep track of the misinformation deliberately spread by the paid operatives, let alone make time to correct such items as the stupid comment made by your hero; that I maintained SAD never saw the child until he was three years old. That’s one straight out of his addled brain. And life’s too short for that.
She took him to see Susan Blake when he was a few weeks old. She presented him as her own. And as there’s been no physical sign of her in Hawaii either before or after the miraculous birth, it’s fair to ask, whose child did she show to Susan Blake?
Like the man said, he didn’t go around with his birth certificate plastered to his forehead...
Stop whining and produce something interesting, your buddy is more than capable of sticking it to people with theories he doesn’t like, without your help.
Get cracking, we aren’t here to prove how clever we are, we are trying to fill in a few gaps in the flawed narrative.
11,060 posted on Saturday, April 13, 2013 8:21:30 PM by Fred Nerks (E)