Cross-posting:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/2306351/posts?page=10862#10862
To: Fred Nerks; LucyT; Cold Case Posse Supporter; Red Steel; Kenny Bunk; Flotsam_Jetsome; edge919
“The same hand which completed the form dated April 21, 1964 - wrote the name Barack Obama TWICE on the memo in August 1961.”
This would imply that the same hand forged both documents which would imply that the INS FOIA documents were all forged. As I explain below, I see no evidence of that, and I have had to assess many signatures professionally, though I don’t claim to be an expert.
With reference to the numerous signatures at the link below...
http://www.scribd.com/doc/54015762/Barack-Hussein-Obama-Sr-Immigration-File
BHO Sr. has a very distinctive and mostly consistent way of writing the capital ‘B’ in Barack which is not used in the memo purported by be written by Mr. Wood in the 1964 memo.
The short version of my analysis is that Senior makes his ‘B’ with two strokes and Wood makes his ‘B’ with a single stroke.
Sr.’s ‘B’ begins with a single down-stroke which often starts too low to form a complete left side of a ‘B’. Then he lifts the pen and begins the two loops of the ‘B’ beginning at the top left of the letter. This results in a notable gap (the size varies) between where the initial downstroke of the ‘B’ started and where the first loop of the second stroke begins at the top left of the letter ‘B’.
Wood’s ‘B’ begins with a downstroke starting high on the left and then he retraces back up that first stroke to begin the loops without lifting the pen. So Wood’s ‘B’ is completed with a single stroke in both examples in the memo. There is no open gap on the left side of the top ‘B’ loop in Wood’s ‘B’s, as there is with Senior’s.
Also, when Sr. finishes his ‘B’ he adds a little delimited loop on the bottom of the lower ‘B’ loop. When continuing with the lower case portion of “Barack,’ Sr. lifts the pen after completing the loop on the ‘B’ and begins the lowercase ‘a’ at the top right of the letter before circling counter-clockwise to complete the letter. Sr. does not retrace across the top of the first ‘a’ in Barack, but Wood does.
Wood doesn’t lift his pen when going from finishing the capital ‘B’ before going to the ‘a’ in the first instance of ‘Barack’ at the top of the memo. Wood cursively goes directly from completing the ‘B’ to begin the top of the ‘a’ at the top right of the letter and retraces the top counter-clockwise before completing the ‘a’ and going on.
These are two very distinctive writing styles, by different people, IMO. I see no evidence or implication of forgery in these or any of the INS FOIA documents.
10,862 posted on Thursday, April 11, 2013 9:34:17 PM by Seizethecarp (Defend aircraft from “runway kill zone” mini-drone helicopter swarm attacks: www.runwaykillzone.com)
Cross-posting:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/2306351/posts?page=10865#10865
To: All; Fred Nerks; LucyT; Cold Case Posse Supporter; WildHighlander57; philman_36; Fantasywriter
“There’s another ‘simple’ explanation...he simply wasn’t married to Kezia and he had no children. In ‘Dreams’ words are put into the mouth of Auma; ‘granny’ Sarah tells them, as they dispute who should inherit, none of you are his children”
“Dreams” is totally unreliable and has been forensically demonstrated to have been extensively penned by Bill Ayers, IMO.
The simple explanation is that Sr. was an opportunistic serial liar who put down whichever wives and children he thought would benefit him most at the time, just as he did with his birth year.
On the record, Kezia says she had a tribal marriage with Senior and legitimate biographers at least more independent than Ayers have not even hinted at finding any evidence that Roy and Auma were not BHO Sr.’s children.
In one of the FOIA documents where ‘wife’ is asked for a name appearing to have been a K for Kezia is crossed out and Ann S. Dunham is written in. Just the fact that the name of one wife is scratched out and another substituted implies at least one additional wife.
Also in one of the FOIA docs ‘Roy Obama’ is named as his son when children are asked for (but not Barry). This son had to come from a prior marriage as declaring bastard children to the INS would be out of the question in 1961, I would think.
In the FOIA docs U of HI officials report to INS that BHO Sr. is believed to still be married in Kenya, even though he ‘married’ Stanley Ann after getting her ‘happa’. INS makes a note to challenge any claim by Sr. to have been married to Stanley Ann based on bigamy and an attempt at using a sham marriage to gain or extend entry to the US.
The Mboya letters archive have BHO Sr. asking Mboya to assist his wife in Nairobi while he is completing his studies at Harvard. I have seen no evidence that the Mboya archive is forged.
10,865 posted on Thursday, April 11, 2013 9:53:14 PM by Seizethecarp (Defend aircraft from “runway kill zone” mini-drone helicopter swarm attacks: www.runwaykillzone.com)