Cross-posting:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/2306351/posts?page=11721#11721
To: Brown Deer; GregNH
It’s all gone too far imo, all I wanted to do was show the results of the research conducted by a group of freepers - and wanted to do that step by step, so that what we saw could be followed.
It was always meant to be a take-or-leave-it proposition. I was just the spokesperson for a dedicated bunch who spent a lot of time trying their best to find out what was behind it all, and wanted to remain anonymous. Some of the group were so nervous of being identified, they didn’t even want their compatriot freepers to know their screen-names. That’s the kind of atmosphere you are living in, if you haven’t noticed.
There are freepers too afraid to post here, who helped, who have asked me not to name them. I’ve kept who they are confidential. I earned their trust and intend to keep it that way.
This has to be my nth attempt, I’ve lost count. Whenever I get ten percent of the way, there he is, deliberately cutting me off and diverting attention. I absolutely refuse to tell the end of the story before the beginning. The trolls want to know the punchline. I’m insisting they listen to the joke. It’s that simple. What we gathered is supported by the sources we collected and I post as often as I can without being boring and repetitious.
I’m through. If the trolls want information they’ll just have to rely on articles in the MSM and the books written in an endless stream, the authors of which are not anonymous and need to be careful.
It’s disappointing to be cut off at the knees with every attempt, but that’s just the way it is. Why they do it beats me, the only reason that makes sense is that removing the myth of the mother from ‘Dreams’ terrifies them - and Bill Ayres has to be laughing of course.
You don’t mess with motherhood. It’s sacrosanct. She’s been implanted into the fairy-tale and getting her out of there would seem to be impossible.
Which is really amusing when you think of it...there’s no physical evidence of her presence in Hawaii, no one has ever come forward who saw her pregnant, the birth announcements don’t name her, no one can say they saw a genuine birth certificate, you never saw her graduation photograph on a full page of the Mercer Island yearbook, let alone an image of her with a full group of class of 1960 students, and there’s nothing from the U of HI to confirm anything other than there was an enrollment for Fall 1960, which you can’t be sure who it was for; the Ann S Obama in the Polk for 1961 just might turn out to be the student Ann Obama whom he met at the Russian Class - from whom he was later separated who returned to the Philippines.
And now we are down to picking at the carcass to try and find that girl in Hawaii by having Maraniss say that Kiri Tith knew her from other sources, other than the student gatherings, during which he does remember Ann or Anne, whose photograph shows her in the room with them all. It’s really too desperate an attempt to locate Stanley Ann Dunham in Hawaii for me to bother with. I can’t be sure, but isn’t that second hand or third hand hearsay?
Btw, accusing me of Alinksy tactics has to be the greatest joke of all. I’m nothing but a retired Australian person, who came to FR in 2003 as a result of my estimation that a certain ‘religion of peace’ was out to destroy us all, and I wanted to make it known that there was a biography of muhammad available on the web as a free download.
I wouldn’t have known Alinsky from a bar of soap.
And the first time I saw an image of zero on TV here in Oz, before he was ever a candidate, my stomach turned over.
Thank you.
11,721 posted on Saturday, April 20, 2013 6:19:35 PM by Fred Nerks (Come Visit Tasmania!)
Cross-posted:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/2306351/posts?page=11695#11695
To: Brown Deer; Fred Nerks; WildHighlander57; Fantasywriter; LucyT
You are smart enough to understand conditional logic, therefore I conclude that it is likely that you are being deceptive and dishonest.
Here are the basics on conditional logic at this link;
http://philosophy.lander.edu/logic/conditional.html
Obots, trolls, SPs and Mal-Val pushers (who are cult believers that Malcolm X is Barry’s dad and Valerie Sarruf is his mom) ALL assert that there is NO chance that Stanley Ann could have gone to Kenya to deliver Barry or even have been Barry’s mom, in the case of the Mal-Val cult members.
Using logic and the known contemporaneous corroborated documented facts I have proposed two CONDITIONAL narratives that could provide the motivation for the funding needed to place Stanley Ann in Kenya.
These are POSSIBLE narratives that provide funding motivation NOT assertions that either narrative is a fact.
It is possible that FMD OR BHO Sr. could have been motivated (note the conditional phrasing) to hide the pregnancy of Stanley Ann for different reasons and to have arranged a sham marriage.
It is possible that FMD OR BHO Sr. could have personally or through backers obtained the funding needed to pay for Stanley Ann to travel to Kenya sometime between Feb 1961 and the delivery of baby Barry.
Conclusive i.e. verifiable evidence has not yet developed that would support conclusive assertion that either man is the dad or where Barry was born and I have repeatedly posted that.
I HAVE conclusively EXCLUDED the possibility that any other woman is Barry’s mom because only Conspiracy Theory (CT) could explain the numerous 1961 documents which back up that conclusion (UH, UW, INS FOIA, HI Newspaper, Polk).
11,695 posted on Saturday, April 20, 2013 12:19:53 PM by Seizethecarp (Defend aircraft from “runway kill zone” mini-drone helicopter swarm attacks: www.runwaykillzone.com)