But you've got to be careful with chinny-chin-chins, they can be tricky:
Because when they show up in future generations that are supposedly unrelated, it becomes a little embarrassing.
Posted on 08/01/2012 11:18:33 AM PDT by Seizethecarp
"Meet The Parents....of alias Barack Obama. Black Sunni Muslim father and White Lebanese Christian mother. Born in the ME, raised in Indonesia, became BHO II in 1982." Dr. Ron J. Polland
The “Mal-Val” youtube video at the link was posted by FReeper Polarik (Dr. Ron Polland) in August of 2011 and while morphing the image of a woman named “Val” into an image of Obama, he insinuates that “Val” is Obama’s mom. One year later this youtube has only 1,150 views.
In July 2012, two FReepers associated the woman, “Val,” in Polarik’s Youtube with Lebanese actress Valerie Sarruf and have posted multiple images of her at various ages on FR eligibility threads. I am opening this thread to invite discussion of and links to any evidence that either supports or refutes a claim that Valerie Sarruf is Barack Obama’s mother, with or without Malcolm X being his father.
Where could Malcolm X and Valerie Sarruf have been in 1960 when baby Barry would have been conceived? Is there any evidence that Sarruf could have been pregnant and delivered a baby in 1961? In what country could the baby have been delivered? How and when could the alleged Mal-Val baby have been inserted into the identity and life narrative of the person we have come to know as Barack Hussein Obama?
Full disclosure: I refute categorically all of the Mal-Val narrative as wildly speculative and unsupported by any evidence that I have seen so far.
For several years now a shadowy coterie of FReepers styling themselves as “researchers” has gone onto nearly every FR eligibility thread to aggressively refute all evidence that Stanley Ann Dunham was Barack Obama’s mother. They have actually declared flat out that she was never in Hawaii before 1963, contrary to the voluminous evidence including INS FOIA documents!
Requests for links or any evidence that Stanley Ann is NOT the mom have been frequently met with abusive ad hominem attacks and accompanied by claims that ALL documentary evidence showing her to have been in Hawaii in 1960 and 1961 is forged, but no credible evidence of forgery has offered. I make this observation as a retired Certified Fraud Examiner and CPA.
For years the “researchers” had claimed mysteriously to have conclusive evidence that a different woman is Barry’s mom, but refused to reveal her name or any evidence other than her picture because the “researchers” claimed it would disappear from the net and/or from hard copy archives of the records. But this month, the “researchers” appear to have slipped up and revealed that Valerie Sarruf has been the woman whose identity they have been “protecting.” They have since attempted to walk back the revelation, but it is clear, IMO.
The “researchers” claim that they earnestly want to remove Obama from office. But wouldn’t revealing ALL EVIDENCE of a foreign mother and foreign birth (which they also claim) be the most logical approach to removing Obama rather than hiding the identity of this alternative mother for years while attacking FR threads that sincerely attempt to find out where Stanley Ann Dunham was when she gave birth to Barry?
In my opinion, the best evidence that Valerie Sarruf is NOT Barry’s mother is the mountain of evidence that Stanley Ann Dunham IS his mother, which the “researchers” have totally failed to refute.
Again, please use this thread for discussion of and links to any evidence that either supports or refutes a claim that Valerie Sarruf IS Barack Obama’s mother with or without Malcolm X being his father.
But you've got to be careful with chinny-chin-chins, they can be tricky:
Because when they show up in future generations that are supposedly unrelated, it becomes a little embarrassing.
Looks like reference to data base.
It’s not the size that is revealing, it’s the shape/bone structure.
And next generations are very revealing indeed.
Very like.
Even chubby.
And I’m thinking they are State Department codings for redactions.
Where else have I seen something similar? The immigration file for the kenyan...I think.
They are all the same so it doesn’t make sense that would be seat assignments or some other thing that would be flight specific.
That's the best I can do, I can show you images, some will see what I see, others will not. The man from the Lumumba University appears to show up as an Adminstration Official for the Consul of Equatorial Guinea, which is the nationality attributed to him in the 1992 newspaper article, in which he was described as a 31 year old law student. The background search which brought up the same nationality appears to show a birthdate of January 8, 1961. It's written as 8.1.1961 because he would have been travelling with an Equatorial Guinea passport, and the previous Spanish colony do not write their dates in the American fashion. And he ain't going bald, no where no how, he just happens to have a forehead like his father...imo, of course. Does the scan from the newspaper make him appear shorter? Yes it does. But he's sitting on a stool and not slumped, in the comparison, and that photo appears to have been taken at a different angle.
Beneath those black redaction rectangles is what you are not allowed to know. It’s what Alice Dewey alluded to, and what Kezia’s statement indicates. Stanley Ann Dunham, Alice Dewey and zero went to Kenya after the old man died.
Three of them went at the same time. Zero pretended to mourn at the grave, Stanley Ann convinced the clan she was the wife he wrote home about and zero was his son.
And as Aunt Zeituni said, the kenyan wrote home and told them he had a son in the US.
How were they to know who the ‘wife’ and the ‘son’ were?
It’s all sort of like The Wizard of Oz, isn’t it?
He musta shrunk or he's got a taller double.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.