If what you want is a FAIR fight, you will INEVITABLY LOSE, period. Each and every single time. History is replete with examples, but all we need do is look at the Pacific campaigns of WWII. We would put as many as 20,000 Marines ashore to crush 4-5,000 Japanese. Neither side fought a “fair” fight. Both fought to WIN! Doing whatever it took.
If Dr. Paul and his people are following the law while fighting to win, then more power to them. We need a WINNER, not some pretty boy with good hair who fights “fair.”
That's not the point I was making. How does RuPaul get voters to pull the lever for him if he is perceived (and dog piled by the MSM, the Dems, The GOP and everyone else) as a dirty, back-room, cheater who stole the nomination via a technicality?
Personally, I'm voting for whoever is running against Obama and has the lead among likely voters. If that's RuPaul, then I'm voting for him. But there are a lot of moderates, centrists, indies, right-leaning dems, conservatives, RINOs, and every other demographic that may not feel the same way. I'd predict if RuPaul *stole* the nomination (technically legal or not) many voters would just skip voting for pres, or write someone in or otherwise hand the election to Obama.
Bad move by RuPaul in my opinion. He's better than Romney or Obama, but I doubt he can pull it off if he does it sneaky & dirty. Opinions may vary...