Replies

[[Overtly challenging the kid while carrying concealed is a big NO NO]]

first of all, whjere did he challenge the kid? Apparently you have evidnece that hte rest of the world isn’t privy to- Secondly, He can carry and confront ANYONE he likes ANY TIME HE LIKES- confrontation is NOT agaisnt hte law- Martin however CRIMINALLY ASSAULTED Zimmerman which Martin did NOT have a right to do

You are makign up rules and makign up facts of the case as you go along in order to support your bleeding heart liberal biass agaisnt gun owners- Martin was LEGALLY within his rights do be o nthat street patroling IF he so wanted to WITH a concealed gun if he so chose to, and confronting any damn person he wanted to whether he was armed or not armed- Martin was NOT legally justified in Criminally Assaulting Zimmerman-

It doesn’t matter if zimmerman was on ‘official neighbiorhood duty’ or not- He was FULLY WITIHIN HIS RIGHTS to carry any damn time he liked and he was udner NO obligation to make that fact known to ANYONE

As for the club comment- Wow- Stunning! You carry your club-, people that actually want protection agaisnt thugs that they don’;t know whether they are armed or not, will continue carrying firearms- You can’t argue with hte FACTS- Violent crimes in Florida have dropped to 40 year low AFTER a million plus conceal carry permits were issued to ordinary citizens fed up with being murdered by thugs with guns- Cities where it’s impossible to get permits to carry the violent crimes are still at all time highs, and climbing every year

“He can carry and confront ANYONE he likes ANY TIME HE LIKES- confrontation is NOT agaisnt hte law- Martin however CRIMINALLY ASSAULTED Zimmerman which Martin did NOT have a right to do”

This is an important point, and according to many conversations I’ve heard lately needs to be pounded into many heads. You can’t instigate violence on a whim, nor to implied threats or potential future threats. The old “freedom to swing my arm ends at your nose” rule applies. The exceptions are few, and are limited to: “fighting words” and obvious overt threats. They do not include following someone and informing on them to a non-emergency telephone service.