Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Texan5
Ernie’s tagline seems more and more appropriate the longer this thread goes

You said it FRiend.

I came back to this thread from eating dinner to see if reason had prevailed, only to find that some here are no longer satisfied to merely join a mob to convict and lynch people because their name of “Kennedy” proves guilt beyond a reasonable doubt never mind due process-but now they have decreed that “defending a Kennedy” makes one a troll who advocates violence against women. Being intolerant like that makes FReepers look worse than liberals.

As I have tried to state many times, this isn't about "defending a Kennedy", the name of the defendant is irrelevant and immaterial, at least that is what we teach our kids (or should be teaching them) and that is why Lady Justice has a blindfold on, because we are ALL supposed to be entitled to 'equal justice before the law'. It is the most simple minded and foolish thing to automatically assume that based on somebody's name, they are guilty. Are the Kennedys a pox on America? I'm inclined to agree, they have caused us plenty of grief as a Nation, and I think the worst of the lot was indeed Fat Teddy, but I'm not going to assign the sins of that dead fat frat boy on someone who had nothing to do with the original offenses.

Douglas Kennedy has been charged with misdemeanor offenses, he (like any American) is entitled to his day in court. If he is found guilty, I'll be the first to say that he should pay whatever penalty the court deems appropriate. But I'm not going to dispense with any pretense of due process and say "he's guilty" and if anyone dares to suggest that a trial might be in order, accuse them of "defending violence against women" like a certain nauseating little troll has been doing. If the court concludes that Douglass Kennedy is guilty, he will be punished according to the law.

Until then, whether we like it or not, he is innocent until proven guilty, which is exactly the way ANY of us would want to be viewed if we were facing criminal charges of any kind.
186 posted on 02/26/2012 4:20:15 PM PST by mkjessup (Romney is to conservatism what e.coli is to an all-you-can-eat salad bar. NO ROMNEY!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies ]


To: mkjessup

The majority of Kennedys are most definately the best example of why the words “political” and “dynasty” should never be in the same sentence. That said, there are good and bad in all families. And I do think there is a distinct possibility of pissed off hospital staff and the smell of money fueling that video-it just looks like something ripe to go bad-but let the court decide that.

And you are dead on-it is not WHO the person is-it is about the law being the same for all. I do believe that was why most of our ancestors came here in the first place. Some of the posts on this thread bring the words “witch hunt” to mind as well as “lynch mob”.

And nanny gestapos need to get lost, period-people need to be responsible for their own families and not expect to sue if some business or institution doesn’t handle everything-”those are the rules because we don’t want to be sued” is just f***ed up logic-this is not the Soviet Union, nor does it need to be...


198 posted on 02/26/2012 5:04:07 PM PST by Texan5 ("You've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson