Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: humblegunner
Tomorrow could very well be a historic day.

If Obama gets thrown off the ballot it will make history and the damn could bust.

If that happens you and another certain FReeper will go down as the biggest losers in the history of Freerepublic, as the wrongest FReepers ever.

If that happens I will start the thread and the size of the crow you will eat will be as large as your mouths.

By all means keep on shooting your big mouth off, it may be your last hurrah and will make the crow that much tastier.

We'll find out tomorrow....

72 posted on 01/25/2012 4:02:13 PM PST by Manic_Episode (Politics is fake. I think it's owned by Vince Mcmahon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: Manic_Episode
If that happens you and another certain FReeper will go down as the biggest losers in the history of Freerepublic, as the wrongest FReepers ever.

Good luck with that.

74 posted on 01/25/2012 4:04:20 PM PST by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

To: Manic_Episode

I’m not getting involved in the “debate” pro-birther, anti-birther, etc. I just want to point out that you shouldn’t really harbor any hopes of a decisive result of any kind tomorrow. At best, the Court will briefly convene, review the procedural status, including Jablonski’s letter, offer Taitz and any other counsel for the parties who appears to weigh in on the situation and then give some guidance on a procedure going forward. Even if he outright rejects Jablonski’s suggestions and his refusal to appear, he would, at best issue some kind of order for another date to hear why he shouldn’t hold Obama and possibly Jablonski in contempt for knowingly disregarding the subpoena.

Look, to one and all, there are valid arguments for and against pursuing these issues. I pray that it doesn’t have to be so contentious among the good patriots on this website. Leaving aside the political wisdom of pursuing the question of Obama’s eligibility to run for or to be President, isn’t it a burning question that should bother us no end? In legal circles, we use the phrase “colorable claim “ to describe a claim that has legs, has some apparent basis to be subjected to scrutiny and adjudication. It may seem, in some respects, unusual, even strange, but there is enough there there to clearly understand that it is not just concocted out of thin air.

So it is with Obama’s eligibility. Although the birth certificate issue has been awfully muddied, the question of NBC status seems like a very clear-cut issue. There is substantial precedent for the principle that NBC requires two American citizen parents and we know that Obama does not meet this definition. Obama’s spectacularly hypocritical lack of transparency regarding so many of his personal records only adds fuel to the fire of doubt about his status.

Please don’t flame me for this. I’m just saying that politics aside, isn’t the question a real question?


90 posted on 01/25/2012 5:44:26 PM PST by JewishRighter (Anybody but Hussein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson