Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Hot Tabasco

Look. This is RIDICULOUS. She REFUSED THE BREATHALYZER TEST and that means you get arrested and hauled down to JAIL! Her pretense for not taking the breathalyzer was she didn’t trust the trooper.... What hogwash. If she “failed” it because he manipulated it she WOULD PASS THE URINE and BLOOD test at the jail! This lady and her ambulance chasing attorney hubby are trying to get out of a DWI charge and/or a charge for refusing a DWI test. No question. Good lord people are naive here. You believe 100% of what the hubby writes, even though it has already been discredited, and 0% of what the police report has. What SHAMELESS members here.


37 posted on 07/03/2011 1:38:53 PM PDT by macquire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: macquire

>>>Good lord people are naive here.

So are you.

>>>What SHAMELESS members here.

No one is forcing you to be here. Perhaps you’d be more at home elsewhere. Don’t let the door hit ya in the arse on your way out.


43 posted on 07/03/2011 1:45:46 PM PDT by Keith in Iowa (FR Class of 1998 | TV News is an oxymoron. | MSNBC = Moonbats Spouting Nothing But Crap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: macquire

Shameless? Look who’s talking. You’re shilling for rogue cops.


54 posted on 07/03/2011 2:08:40 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: macquire

WE may be shameless but we only hit the post button once.


154 posted on 07/03/2011 4:33:12 PM PDT by antisocial (Texas SCV - Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: macquire

She didn’t refuse the breath test (there is video of her blowing 0.00).

And I don’t believe the state yanks troopers off patrol duty based simply on “he-said; she-said” - they are short-handed as it is. So, based on the actions taken by the state in restricting *both* troopers to admin duty, it is reasonable to believe that (at the very least) the troopers either admitted to colluding to stop the husband; or there were radio records evidencing that collusion and/or this incident was yet another in a pattern of bad behavior by the officer(s).

If you could get cops put in “time-out” just by writing a letter to the governor, then this would likely be a far more common occurrence - but it isn’t. Is it?


276 posted on 07/03/2011 10:33:31 PM PDT by jaydee770
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson