You use the term meddle like you favor it ... are you sure Freerepublic is your kind of community? We ‘meddle’ in the criminality of the democrat party and its schemes. The SCOTUS stopped a state which wasviolating its own constitution and the election laws on a federal level. I’d say that makes what they did something far different from meddling, as poseurs like to put it.
No, I used the term "meddle" because the previous poster did. That's why I put it in quotes. Did you simply not read the exchange at all?
The SCOTUS stopped a state which wasviolating its own constitution and the election laws on a federal level. I’d say that makes what they did something far different from meddling, as poseurs like to put it.
Yes, the Supreme Court did the right thing in Bush v Gore. Your should be taking issue with the poster I was arguing with who said the courts don't like to "meddle" in the election process as evidence of why they won't take the birther cases or rule in favor of birther arguments. The Supreme Court plainly WILL take an election case if there is any grounds to do so. Birthers have simply provided nothing the courts deem worthy to even bother with which further demonstrates the utter weakness of birther arguments.