No, I would say the anomalies are definitely abnormal.
I’m a non-tech person just trying to follow the discussion. Just from what I’ve read it looks fake to me.
Agreed the ones that don't have logical explanations are. I brought up way back aliasing (in graphics arts called "the jaggies") versus anti-aliasing. Parts are one way and parts another. Most of the large characters including the typewritten ones we have been talking about are aliased (edges are jagged). Some parts are anti-aliased (edges softened or feathered for aesthetics). This indicates to me that portions were pieced together unless someone can offer a reasonable explanation to the contrary.
Notice also by zooming up that the lines of the form itself are anti-aliased whereas the titles for each box are not. I'm unable to offer an explanation for the differences offhand.
IIRC even part of Stanley's signature is aliased and part isn't.
For the anti-aliasing I have to rely on the layers exposed by various Youtube contributers as I don't have software to break down the document into its component layers. Bear in mind that we only know about the layers in the finished product, not ones that may, notice I said may, have been used in creating the document and discarded prior to publishing on the web.
No one has satisfactory explained why the first two of the set of three empty check boxes are identical down to the last pixel as well as the 1's in 151 other than to say I was wrong (I don't believe I'm wrong about this; one freeper pointed it out to me and one says I'm wrong but never posted back after I explained the testing I had done).