We would expect that a good forgery would look pretty much like other documents of similar nature and vintage.
The Nordyke Twins documents are of similar nature and vintage. There are a lot of common features there.
I'm totally aware of that and have tried to be objective. As I noted before, except for what's typed on it (and some of that as discussed ad nauseum), Obama's looks totally different from the Nordyke twins, made a point why I thought such.
I've stopped short of pronouncing it an outright forgery. But I'm not convinced the whole thing is genuine either, maybe never will.
Yes, the computer age makes it different, have to take that into consideration. Just because I see and notice one thing doesn't make it true everywhere. Every method has its inherent shortcomings though.