[matt1234]

When libs argue, they:

• Change the subject.
• Ask questions to deflect counterarguments.
• Try to change the meaning of words.
• Cite unsupported facts or make up facts to suit their argument.

You've used these techniques throughout this entire thread. You've been presented evidence that some of your statements are false, yet you refuse to concede that you are wrong. These behaviors suggest stubbornness, immaturity, and a disconnect from reality, all tell-tale signs of liberal thinking. Good luck with all that. I suggest a course in logic for starters. I will not debate you any more. I'm sure you'll want the last word, and you can have it.

[Drennan Whyte]

You've used these techniques throughout this entire thread.

I beg your pardon? You are the one claiming that they were enlisted as soldiers. Pointing out that their service was not supported by the state or accepted by the Confederate government is not changing the subject. It's pointing out the errors in your story. You seem to believe that there were legions of stalwart Black soldiers fighting side by side with their white compatriots in defense of Confederate honor, and that their service was recognized and respected by the Davis government and their white comrades-in-arms. Nothing could be further from the truth.

So if pointing out the errors in your story and not accepting your stories as fact is 'arguing like a liberal' then I would imagine that you get your clock cleaned by liberals on a regular basis.

[sergeantdave]

Drennan Whyte is Non Sequitur. Non Sequitur is Drennan Whyte.