[matt1234]

Well I sure hope you can do better than an unsourced wikipedia entry to support your claim partner. The Louisiana Native Guard issue has become a textbook example of how confederate revisionists "manufacture" evidence to support their claims.

Forget the photos and revisionism. I am not familiar with the photos, and I do not support revisionism. My purpose was to inject historical accuracy into the debate where I found it lacking. That is it. You made an incorrect statement, and I corrected it (to wit, posts # 238 and 241). You effectively admitted you were wrong in post # 294. Are you now retracting that admission? What is your real issue: historical accuracy or a dislike of being corrected?

[mac_truck]

I stand by my remarks. You haven’t proven anything, unless it’s how gullible you are.