[mac_truck]

For what it's worth, here's the best way I know how to quickly illustrate that there were no questions about Obama's eligibility before June 2008. Remember "The Obama Nation"? Corsi finished writing it in early June 2008, and published it in July. It included nearly every claim about Obama you can imagine, and Corsi himself has been a pretty vocal Birther the last couple of years. But do you know how much space Corsi devotes in the book to Obama's eligibility? ZERO. Absolutely none. Not even a sentence. He doesn't question Obama's birthplace or eligibility one jot. And he didn't talk about it because when he finished writing the book, there hadn't been discussion about Obama's eligibility floating around beforehand. Certainly not since January 2007. Oh, and WorldNetDaily's very first article about Obama's birthplace and/or eligibility? June 10, 2008. The same date as FreeRepublic's first thread on the subject.

Good information, bump.

[Las Vegas Ron]

Except it’s not true:

To: Robert Drobot
“Obama was born Aug. 4, 1961, in Honolulu, Hawaii,”

Has this been verified to be correct? Is Obama a natural born citizen of the U.S. as required by our Constitution?

In a county of background checks for almost any job, background checks have become a way of life. As anyone seen Obama’s birth certificate and verified it? Would you accept his word he is qualified to be POTUS as defined by our Constitution?

6 posted on Wednesday, February 07, 2007 2:21:29 AM by tiger-one (The night has a thousand eyes)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1780530/posts#6