Your research? Perhaps you can justify your 'conclusion' with empirical data.
What's that? You don't have any? Your 'conclusion' is just extremely biased conjecture? Shocking! Just shocking!!
In that case, lacking empirical data, perhaps you would like to astound us with an indepth statistical analysis that would mathematically model and support your preposterous 'conclusion'.
I'd be interested to see the math. Don't forget to include the time period for your 'study', sample population (which should include some discussion on age, gender, race, financial status, etc.), dependency rules, a kurtosis model, bias and normalcy evaluation, outlier removal, 2 sigma reduction, etc. In other words, whatever it was you did to arrive at your 'conclusion'.
Well my mama was right, as all you Southerns know, this is what happens when one bothers with yankee trash.
Hope ya'll are having a good day. Free Dixie!
That's right clownboy. It turns out there's about fifteen volumes of Congressional testimony regarding southern Klan activity in the 1870-1872 period alone, including several volumes on South Carolina alone. I'm gonna make Chesterfield County circa 1871 a special research project just for you and little miss priss.
Count on it.