Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Conservative9
No contradiction. Lee had no slaves by the time the invasion from the north took place.

He had 40-odd. Inherited from his father-in-law. Regardless, Lee didn't have any real problems with the institution to begin with.

269 posted on 03/13/2010 2:37:04 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur

Robert E. Lee did not own slaves, but many Union generals did. When his father-in-law died, Lee took over the management of the plantation his wife had inherited and immediately began freeing the slaves. By the time Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863, every slave in Lee’s charge had been freed. I already mentioned he freed the slaves he inherited from his father. He lived in a time when slavery was legal and had not control over what either father did. He did have control over what he did and did not retain the slaves willed to him. Notably, some Union generals didn’t free their slaves until the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment in 1868.

You are intent on destroying a man that leaders on both sides of the Potomac had great respect and admiration for. He was a decent man. Lee vigorously opposed slavery and as early as 1856 made this statement: “There are few, I believe, in this enlightened age, who will not acknowledge that slavery as an institution is a moral and political evil.”


272 posted on 03/13/2010 3:53:56 PM PST by Conservative9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson