He hasn’t provided anything that is logical or legally adequate.
*I believe* is just his opinion and doesn’t cut it.
If you haven’t seen what’s been going on on FR lately, either you are willfully blind or part of the problem.
According to the laws of the land a Presidential candidate has to prove his eligibility to the states to be placed on the ballot. According to the laws of the land the winner of a Presidential election has to have the election certified by Congress. The President Elect is not required to provide proof of anything to Tom, Dick or Harry unless they are elected representatives serving either as one of the Secretaries of State or Member of Congress. He is not required by any law to provide you or anyone but the people listed above anything.
He was certified eligible 51 times. Were all those people wrong? Maybe. But that is the system We the People created through our elected officials. You can change your elected officials. You can elect people who will change the system. But the President of the United States is not required to answer the questions of 300 million individual citizens.
Where is what I wrote logically or legally incorrect?
Absolutely.
Anyone who reads for a few hours with an open mind can see what has been happening.