I looked again. I was right:
“I went back to see exactly what you were talking about. The image of the COLB could only be entered into evidence as what it is, a photograph of a thing. If in court, the document itself would be presented into evidence. Some courts would want a certified copy. Some wouldn’t. But as evidence, oh yes the COLB could be easily introduced and accepted.”
Photo entered as a photo. Document ITSELF presented either certified or not, depending on court. COLB [not the photo of the COLB] easily introduced.
I put that last part in because some Birthers have argued the COLB is so unreliable that no court would accept it. There was a thread last nite on that exact point put up by buckeyetexan.
pasy, who says again, READ BEFORE YOU LEAP!
If the COLB is so easily introduced, why the perpetual refusal to introduce it??