[edge919]

That would be more compelling a point if 10 we didn't have independent third party verification that it is also a real documents, and 2) you had anything to contradict it.

Can you cite the document forensics credentials of this alleged independent third party??

No court has ever even asked to see it.

A lucky happenstance for Barry Soetoro. The standing issue has prevented this from being a necessity. Of course, if it was volunteered by defence council, it could have been officially verified as real by an offical legal body. Until then, it has no legal value.

[EnderWiggins]

"Can you cite the document forensics credentials of this alleged independent third party??"

LOL... Why would a document forensics expert be needed? Did you not read the post on the Federal Rules of Evidence? That's why we certify documents in the first place. So that no experts are necessary.

Now if you have any evidence that contradicts it and can thereby justify the additional need for some forensic expert to get involved, go for it. Until you do though, the document authenticates itself.

"A lucky happenstance for Barry Soetoro."

Luck's got nothing to do with. He has evidence, you do not. No luck involved.