To: Man50D; ilovesarah2012
Remember the announcements from the DNC that stated the candidate was Obama? And it said that they found him Constitutionally eligible? Accept that statement had been removed from some of the states documents? It was signed by Pelosi. Does ANYONE actually believe that she bothered vetting Obama? No.
So the answer to ilovesarah2012's question is, yes, they are supposed to prove eligibility. ilovesarah2012, do you think the DNC or Pelosi asked for proof? LOLOL
506 posted on
02/24/2010 10:23:18 AM PST by
DJ MacWoW
(Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
To: DJ MacWoW
So the bottom line is they do not have to PROVE they are natural born.
To: DJ MacWoW; Man50D; ilovesarah2012
Remember the announcements from the DNC that stated the candidate was Obama? And it said that they found him Constitutionally eligible?Every time Nancy signed her name to those 57, mmm uh, 50 states she was lying. She swore with her signature that he was eligible, yet where is the proof? Those are contracts and she committed fraud. She further proved she knew it was fraud by signing a different one for Hawaii. Nancy should be the subject of headlines on this but for some reason, she has escaped the spotlight.
580 posted on
02/24/2010 11:54:16 AM PST by
bgill
(The framers of the US Constitution established an entire federal government in 18 pages.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson