Oh no.... this is not circular logic at all. It makes 100% sense and matches COMPLETELY what I know of my own birth in Hawaii and all the information on my COLB and Long form.
Also check post 41
This is smoking hot gun with bouncing shell casing.
"Historically, most often the 'date accepted' and the 'date filed' is the same date as the majority of births occur on O’ahu (the island with the largest population in our state). In the past, when births were recorded on paper they may have been accepted at a health office on an island other than O’ahu, such as Kaua’i. The paper record would then need to be sent to O’ahu to have a file number placed on it, and the filed date would then be sometime later (as you know, the state of Hawai’i is comprised of multiple islands with miles of water in between). The electronic age has changed this process significantly, and it was determined some time ago that one date would suffice."
Obama claims he was born in Honolulu. So his filed and accepted dates would be the same as noted above by Okubo?
butterdezillion also left out this little nugget.
It is difficult for me to respond to your request because I do not possess a legal background. I can verify that sufficient evidentiary requirements must be met for the DOH to issue a certificate of live birth.
If Obama's online COLB is not a forgery, then the above statement indicates that he submitted sufficient evidence to obtain a COLB, does it not?