******
Poor Obama. The story of the Nordyke twins' birth at Kapiolani hospital on Aug. 5 is like a thorn in Obama's side that he cannot shake and voters can't forget about.
1. For instance, to me, the fact that the Nordyke twins' birth announcement was in the Aug. 16 paper, as I recall, while the Obama birth announcement was in the paper on Aug. 13, as I recall, makes me believe even more that Obama was NOT born at Kapiolani hospital at he claims.
2. My argument is this: If Obama was born on Aug.4 at Kapiolani hospital and the Nordyke twins were born one day later on Aug. 5 at the same Kapiolani hospital, then I say that all these births should be listed in the newspaper on the same date, specifically on Aug. 16, the day the Nordyke births are listed.
3. That is, because the Nordyke twins' births were listed in the Aug. 16 newspaper, I argue that Obama should have been listed in the newspaper on that date also and not in the Aug.13 newspaper, if Obama had been born at Kapiolani like the Nordyke twins.
4. To me, Obama was listed in the Aug. 13 newspaper and not in the Aug.16 newspaper like the Nordyke twins because the source of Obama's birth information did NOT come from Kapiolani hospital like the Nordyke twins' birth information did. Rather, Obama's birth information arrived at the Hawaii Health Department from somewhere else, because Obama was not born in Kapiolani hospital as he claims.
5. And what other source was that? I say that Obama's mother or grandmother delivered Obama's birth certificate to the Hawaii Health Department themselves because Obama was not born in a hospital in Hawaii, and that is why I believe that once we see Obama's 1961 long form birth certificate, we won't see a doctor's name or a hospital name on it.
1. For instance, to me, the fact that the Nordyke twins’ birth announcement was in the Aug. 16 paper, as I recall, while the Obama birth announcement was in the paper on Aug. 13
This totally confirms the fact that the birth announcements are taken directly from the DOH.
‘0’s birth registered 3 days before Nordykes and ‘0’s birth anouncement 3 days prior to Nordkyes, thus the information for ‘0’s birth was not entered in the same ‘BATCH’ as the Nordykes, therefore ‘0’s cert # should be lower than the Nordykes.
Sure we will, just as soon as the ink dries.