That description was taken from a we site to illustrate that converting files is indeed optimizing photos.
The poster that I sent that to said that optimizing and file conversion were not the same.
.jpeg is a good format but can slightly dull the edges in certain circumstances due to the compression, not that the casual observer would ever notice though.
Most graphic artist are anal about things like that, hence the description of .jeg
The poster that I sent that to said that optimizing and file conversion were not the same.
I don't think it is the same. It could be, but not necessarily. Optimizing would be a conversion, but conversion of a file could be many things, optimizing being just one of them.
Please post a link, I'd like to take a look at the source of the info.
Thanks