Replies

“The Punker’s image was the original high resolution copy that Orly's reduced image derived from, and you cannot see the misspelling on that.”

See this post by BP2 showing close-ups of the original Orly Lavender BC and the “Punked” BC in which Orly's is higher resolution.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2306351/posts?q=1&;page=7846

Here is a larger image from BP2 before Hoosiermama pointed out that the Orly image had “mai_en” not “maleen”:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2306351/posts?q=1&;page=7835

I read the Orly Lavender BC as “mai_en” and the “Punked” BC as maleen.

I do not see the paper folds and creases as identical as is discussed by BP2.

Textile weave proves nothing.

Neither the Orly BC nor the "punked" BC has been subjected to forensic examination, yet you claim to know which one is an original. I make no firm assertions of authenticity either way. I just call the specific features as I see them.

"I read the Orly Lavender BC as “mai_en” and the “Punked” BC as maleen."

1) You are seeing only what you wish to see. The resolution of BP2's images do not allow that distinction to be made. In point of fact, the document says "maieen."

2) Think for just one moment as a non-Birther and ask yourself how much sense does it make that the single misspelling on the Punked document would happen to be exactly at the one point where there was piece of crap on the Orly version covering it up? The odds of that (stealing from the E-Trade Baby) are the same as being attacked by a polar bear and an ordinary bear on the same day.

3) Again... the Punked forger released the identical photograph as Orly's, but at a higher resolution. This proves that either he is the source, or at least closer to that source than Orly ever was.

"I do not see the paper folds and creases as identical as is discussed by BP2."

This is only because you are comparing two different photographs in two different lighting situations. The original shows the creases to be identical.

"Textile weave proves nothing."

You must know nothing then about textiles. Weave is absolutely diagnostic!!!

"Neither the Orly BC nor the "punked" BC has been subjected to forensic examination, yet you claim to know which one is an original. I make no firm assertions of authenticity either way. I just call the specific features as I see them."

And in so doing you demonstrate only one reason why Birther lies never die.