[EnderWiggins]

"Yes, I would like them to release additional index data to confirm the legitimacy of the alleged COLB. According to a Hawaii legal opinion letter, file numbers are permissable parts of index data for public release."Index data consisting of name, age, and sex of the registrant and date, type and file number of the vital event and such other data as the director may authorize may be made available to the public."

That letter is from 1990. It quotes a version of the statute that is no longer in effect. Nice try, but without a time machine, you've already gotten everything the statute currently allows.

"Wrong. Re-read ... "other data as the director may authorize" ... there's virtually ZERO limitations (pun intended)."

Except (again) the limitation of not being able to release information forbidden by law to release.

"Public interest and transparency are definitely interrelated concepts. Here's a good example linking the two concepts ... specifically with Obama."

How would you know? You continue to demonstrate no valid understanding of either. You have demonstrated no genuine public interest that would be served by accessing Obama's original birth certificate other than satisfying your prurient (see, I used the word again) interest in knowing the name of his attending physician... something with exactly no relevance to his eligibility as President.

"He posted an alleged COLB. There's no confidentiality at risk."

1) The law does not care what Obama has done... he can do anything he wants. The law places limitations on the Hawaii DOH, and the DOH would still be breaking the law were they to release the information to you.

2) The COLB (which you acknowledge he has released, good for you) contains 100% of the information necessary to prove his natural born American citizenship. So again... there is no public interest that outweighs the confidentiality of the original document.

[edge919]

That letter is from 1990. It quotes a version of the statute that is no longer in effect. Nice try, but without a time machine, you've already gotten everything the statute currently allows.

The only thing that's changed is the default data items. The other items that were dropped from the language weren't specifically restricted from release, especially when at least one item has already been publicly released at brith.

Except (again) the limitation of not being able to release information forbidden by law to release.

There is no information forbidden by release. Information is limited in some applications, but none is strictly forbidden, especially not in 338-18(d). The director has unlimited discretionary authority.

How would you know?

Because I read and comprehend. All you do is deny and come up with painfully contorted outburts.

The law places limitations on the Hawaii DOH, and the DOH would still be breaking the law were they to release the information to you.

Wrong. I've shown that it hasn't. You cite one part of the law and ignore the rest. Ignorance is not an excuse to hide the truth.

...100% of the information necessary to prove his natural born American citizenship

It contains information that might have relevance, but only if it can be supported as genuine. Otherwise, people like you would just fall for every counterfeit document that comes along. The DOH refuses affirm the alleged COLB despite having FULL statutory authority to do so. The public interest is massive, tangible and direct. It's time to quit making excuses, twisting the facts and carrying water for a fraud. Demand better from yourself.

[BP2]

LOL! Come on ... admit it, Wiggy.
You're just JEALOUS your "proof"
of Obama's birth is less CREDIBLE than
the others out there on the Internet.

Speaking of which, we're still waiting on a response on your
screwed up logic on Obama's FactCheck COLB ...

Please rate the integrity & honesty surrounding
the Chain of Custody of Obama's "birth certificate."

Answer the following honestly ("1" is LOW, "10" is HIGH):

Rate the integrity & honesty of Barack Hussein Obama?

Rate the integrity & honesty of Obama's
2008 Chicago Campaign office?

Rate the non-partisanship of FactCheck.org
in "evaluating" Obama's COLB?

Rate the integrity & honesty of Nancy Pelosi and the DNC?

From to to by