[edge919]

An original birth certificate does NOT = vital recordssssss (plural, do you understand??). If the little bastard’s BC was legit and proved place of birth, there’s no need to cite anything else, yet she did. And she made certain to explain that she wasn’t talking about the birth certificate which was cited in a completely separate statement. Let’s not perpetuate another faither myth and assume she was talking about something when she clearly wasn’t.

[EnderWiggins]

"An original birth certificate does NOT = vital recordssssss (plural, do you understand??).

I know that Birthers have an obsession with parsing plurals, generally in the service of bastardizing common English language usage. But sorry, a reference to "vital records" is simply common usage for a category of document. The specific document(s) in question has been explicitly identified by Dr. Fukino, so your continued confusion is frankly inexplicable.

" If the little bastard’s BC was legit and proved place of birth, there’s no need to cite anything else, yet she did."

In point of fact (and it's a shame I have to point this out to you so many times) the only document she actually cited at all was his "original birth certificate."

Like MissTickly and butterdezillion, you have allowed your imagination to get the best of you and have deluded yourself to believe she has said things that cannot be found in either of her statements or in any related correspondence.

To believe that someone's failure to say what you wanted them to say is actually a secret way of saying what you wanted anyway... well it's just insane.