The Wong court says you’re only a citizen if you have permanent allegiance based on your parents being permanent immigrants. I got it from the beginning. Your Wong is wrong and not too strong.
And I have excerpted from Wong and Indiana numerous times and shown you that you are flatly 100% wrong. This is why I get testy with you. The Wong oourt didn’t say no such thing. Language resembling that is in there and you keep pulling it out, but you ain’t reading far enough. There is a difference between factual background in a case and the reasoning and holding in a case.
This is where I am up against the brick wall. If you show someone something, and they just keep ignoring it, there ain’t nothing else you can do. Except suggest they not pursue law as a career.
parsy, who almost feels sorry for you...